D*sh Network v. Cho and nfusion

 

Silver Member
Username: Kbox

Post Number: 213
Registered: Jul-09
D*sh Network v. Cho
Mamertine, Inc. (NFusion, Inc.)

Defendants Michael Cho and Jason Cho are satellite pirates who distribute devices that enable comsumers to illegally intercept and decrypt D*SH Network's pay-television programming without authorization and without payment of a subscription fee to D*SH Network. Michael Cho and Jason Cho perform their illegal acts individually and under the name of their business Mamertine, Inc. d/b/a NFUSION and NFUSION, Inc.

Each defendant individually, and together, does business as NFusion and NFusion, Inc. (including using various alternate spellings such as "nfusion," collectively "NFusion"). NFusion is an assumed name and d/b/a of Michael Cho, Jason Cho, and Mamertine, Inc. NFusion is also the brand name defendants use for their satellite receivers.

Defendants are involved in and/or are responsible for designing, developing, manufacturing, importing, distributing, trafficking-in, promoting and servicing piracy devices called NFusion Receivers and/or components thereof (collectively "NFusion Receivers"), and other circumvention devices and/or components thereof including NFusion 8PSK Turbo Board and NFusion pirate software.

Defendants' NFusion Receivers and pirate software are designed to and utilize a new form of satellite piracy known as Internet Key Sharing ("IKS") (and sometimes referred to as Control Word Sharing).

NFusion Receivers are designed for and do engage in IKS piracy.
D*sh Network LLC et al v. Cho et al

Plaintiffs: D*sh Network LLC, E*hostar Technologies LLC and N*grastar LLC
Defendants: Jason Cho, Michael Cho and Mamerine Inc.

Case Number: 2:2010cv00940
Filed: June 17, 2010

Court: Nevada District Court
Office: Las Vegas Office

Nature of Suit: Intellectual Property - Copyrights
Cause: 17:504 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
__________________
The information contained herein is gathered from various public sources and is presented here for informational use only. According to United States Law, the redistribution of said information is considered a form of free speech and is protected as such.
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us