C00lsat 6000
|
New member Username: Mas7erPost Number: 1 Registered: Dec-09 | just bought a c00lsat 6000 and dont know where to get the bins. havent done this in years.thanks | |
|
Platinum Member Username: NydasPost Number: 17245 Registered: Jun-06 | You need the new BIN and a device called R-link, costing about $90. Currently it is being shipped only to the US customers. For More information, |
|
|
Silver Member Username: ChumleyPost Number: 794 Registered: Dec-08 |
|
|
|
Silver Member Username: ChumleyPost Number: 795 Registered: Dec-08 | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE DISH NETWORK, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAVID SMITH, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-38-ART ORDER *** *** *** *** Plaintiffs filed the complaint in this case under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and the Communications Act on March 20, 2009. R.1; 17 U.S.C. 1201; 47 U.S.C. 605. On March 25, 2009, the Court granted Plaintiffs a temporary restraining order against Defendants. R. 12. Plaintiffs were required to file a $100,000 security bond with the Court. R. 15. Plaintiffs and Defendants entered into a consent decree on November 19, 2009. R. 51. On December 22, 2009, Plaintiffs and Defendants filed a joint motion to approve the consent decree agreed to by the parties in this case. R. 51. The decree requires Defendants to make a settlement payment of $2,500,000 to Plaintiffs. Id. at 5. Defendants are also permanently enjoined from knowingly participating in any of the activities as listed in the consent decree. Id at 3-4. Should Defendants ever breach any part of the permanent injunction, they will be liable to Plaintiffs for $110,000 for each violation. Id. at 4. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1 The motion to approve the consent decree, R. 51, is GRANTED. 2 The effective date of the consent decree shall be the date of this order. 3 The court clerk shall RELEASE Plaintiffs' $100,000 security bond, R. 15. 4 This case is DISMISSED as settled and shall be STRICKEN from the Court's active docket. This the 23rd day of December, 2009. |
|
|
Platinum Member Username: NydasPost Number: 17281 Registered: Jun-06 | Chumley has posted 1. "Final Judgment". It is only a proposed final judgment and hasno standing in law. 2. A document purporting to be an "Consented to" Court Order dated 23rd day of December, 2009. I have not been able to find so far any other source of this document. |
|
|
Platinum Member Username: NydasPost Number: 17284 Registered: Jun-06 | Chumley - Silver Member Username: Chumley Post Number: 795 - Registered: Dec-08 You are seasoned enough to know not to highjack a thread. Please start your own thread if you want to discuss another matter besides C00LSAT 6000. |
UploadMain Forums
Today's Posts- Home Audio Forum
- Home Video Forum
- Home Theater Forum
- Car Audio Forum
- Accessories Forum
- All Forum Topics