Bev is back to Nag2
|
Silver Member Username: LuserPost Number: 334 Registered: Nov-07 | Yep! |
|
Silver Member Username: Tigger_woodsWONT BE GOLFING, UNTIL BUICK OPEN Post Number: 763 Registered: Jun-07 | Yes I have Bev wide open as we speak, she loves it. |
|
Silver Member Username: Tigger_woodsWONT BE GOLFING, UNTIL BUICK OPEN Post Number: 764 Registered: Jun-07 | We need Tiger back for good of the game - Mickelson 16/11/2008 1:00:01 AM WORLD golf is sorely missing Tiger Woods and the sooner he is back the better, says Phil Mickelson, who is concerned about the impact on television ratings and fans. The top-ranked Woods has not taken a full swing since his final play-off hole at last June's US Open, where he won his 14th major despite knee pain to move within four of matching Jack Nicklaus's all-time career record. Subsequent surgery has kept him on the sidelines, although he has said he is "very confident" of playing at the US Masters in April. Mickelson said his fellow American had done so much for golf that his absence hurt the game. "The reason why we all want Tiger back is because he drives the game of golf," said Mickelson, who lost his world No.2 ranking to Sergio Garcia in Shanghai on Monday. "He drives television ratings, the sponsors need him in their events and the fans turn out to see him, so we need him back as soon as possible." Mickelson added that Woods had broken through a barrier he thought would never be possible for a golfer - becoming the top athlete in the world. "We're very lucky in the sport of golf to have the No.1 athlete in the world," he said. "I never thought that would happen when I first came on tour, when we had some of the greatest players in history. Whether it was Ben Hogan or Jack Nicklaus, nobody ever reached the status of the No.1 premier athlete in the world, and it's in golf. "I never thought that was possible, so he does so much for us on a national level in the United States and on an international level throughout the world, and we all miss him and want him back soon." While Woods is confident he will play next year's Masters, he has not set a concrete timetable for his return, with the situation complicated by his wife expecting their second child. "Next year," Woods said when asked by ESPN last month when he would be swinging a club again. "If I have six months off from surgery, that puts me into January, and another four months, that puts me at pretty much 10 months. That's a long time. I figure I can come back after 10 months." Source: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/11/15/1226318995880. ... © SMH |
|
Silver Member Username: BruceleeBeverly Hills, California United States Post Number: 186 Registered: Mar-06 | What are you talking about? I don't see BEV anywhere? |
|
Silver Member Username: LetmeonPost Number: 247 Registered: Mar-06 | BEV is still down !!! |
|
Platinum Member Username: NydasPost Number: 13147 Registered: Jun-06 | BEV is NOT up on Pansat 2500-2700 conversions. |
|
Gold Member Username: PlymouthCanada Post Number: 5711 Registered: Jan-08 | Bev is up on which receiver?  |
|
Silver Member Username: Xoide007Post Number: 111 Registered: Apr-06 | is a lie |
|
Silver Member Username: Mohamad_obamaTerhan, Iran Iran Post Number: 178 Registered: Oct-08 | On a subbed receiver. |
|
Silver Member Username: JojogunFairfield, CA United States Post Number: 463 Registered: Apr-06 | Hey..........for any who are interested, I just went through the Venus channels and found 1 that was still up and running. Venus 10. I wasn't interested so I quickly changed channels. |
|
Silver Member Username: RescateVENEZUELA, M... Post Number: 339 Registered: Nov-07 | Well I don't know if is nag2 or 3, but I still watching have some channels on nfusion: MC1, MC2, MC3, EA1, EA2, SRC-M Regards |
|
New member Username: HeamauxPost Number: 2 Registered: Aug-07 | Jojogun that channel is my favorite! |
|
Gold Member Username: PlymouthCanada Post Number: 5720 Registered: Jan-08 |  |
|
Silver Member Username: ZagrosPost Number: 208 Registered: Apr-06 | it is down on my Pansat 3500. |
|
Silver Member Username: ZagrosPost Number: 209 Registered: Apr-06 |  |
|
Silver Member Username: LuserPost Number: 335 Registered: Nov-07 | Emunation for dvb cards doesnt even startup for nag3 is once again successfully decripting emms on bev. no picture probably due to typical map timing ecm. Coders should check it out. |
|
Silver Member Username: BernardmiPost Number: 248 Registered: Dec-07 | Rescate: SRC-Montreal and CBC-Toronto are still Nagra 2. I suspect CBC has many remote community repeaters using BEV receivers as headends and their technicians did not have time to go to all theses sites to swap cards. So they will remain Nagra 2. Why is the g*ay PPV Vu10 still unlocked remains a mistery !!! |
|
Gold Member Username: PlymouthCanada Post Number: 5756 Registered: Jan-08 | Bernard C'est probablement les gars de Bev qui vienne ici faire le trouble et qui traite tout le monde de pedo et de gai. C, est surement une farce pour nous écoeuré LOL |
|
Silver Member Username: BernardmiPost Number: 249 Registered: Dec-07 | Sans doute hihihi |
|
Silver Member Username: LuserPost Number: 336 Registered: Nov-07 | Quand Bev commence a travailler avec votre prochain bin juste se rappeler de vous entendu de Semore premier. |
|
Silver Member Username: Tigger_woodsWONT BE GOLFING, UNTIL BUICK OPEN Post Number: 765 Registered: Jun-07 | 16/11/2008 1:00:01 AM WORLD golf is sorely missing Tiger Woods and the sooner he is back the better, says Phil Mickelson, who is concerned about the impact on television ratings and fans. The top-ranked Woods has not taken a full swing since his final play-off hole at last June's US Open, where he won his 14th major despite knee pain to move within four of matching Jack Nicklaus's all-time career record. Subsequent surgery has kept him on the sidelines, although he has said he is "very confident" of playing at the US Masters in April. Mickelson said his fellow American had done so much for golf that his absence hurt the game. "The reason why we all want Tiger back is because he drives the game of golf," said Mickelson, who lost his world No.2 ranking to Sergio Garcia in Shanghai on Monday. "He drives television ratings, the sponsors need him in their events and the fans turn out to see him, so we need him back as soon as possible." Mickelson added that Woods had broken through a barrier he thought would never be possible for a golfer - becoming the top athlete in the world. "We're very lucky in the sport of golf to have the No.1 athlete in the world," he said. "I never thought that would happen when I first came on tour, when we had some of the greatest players in history. Whether it was Ben Hogan or Jack Nicklaus, nobody ever reached the status of the No.1 premier athlete in the world, and it's in golf. "I never thought that was possible, so he does so much for us on a national level in the United States and on an international level throughout the world, and we all miss him and want him back soon." While Woods is confident he will play next year's Masters, he has not set a concrete timetable for his return, with the situation complicated by his wife expecting their second child. "Next year," Woods said when asked by ESPN last month when he would be swinging a club again. "If I have six months off from surgery, that puts me into January, and another four months, that puts me at pretty much 10 months. That's a long time. I figure I can come back after 10 months." |
|
Silver Member Username: BernardmiPost Number: 250 Registered: Dec-07 | That is one way to end a pertinent thread.... By inserting non pertinent material. |
|
Silver Member Username: Tigger_woodsWONT BE GOLFING, UNTIL BUICK OPEN Post Number: 766 Registered: Jun-07 | That is one way to end a pertinent thread.... SORRY I did not realize it was pertinent? I mean Bev has not gone back to Nagra 2. What, you are not a fan of TW???  |
|
Silver Member Username: BernardmiPost Number: 252 Registered: Dec-07 | No it has not gone back to Nagra 2. It is still Nagra 2 !!!! On 3 channels..... LOL No I could not care less about golf. But yes TW is a fine person. |
|
Silver Member Username: MrgregOnt. Canada Post Number: 124 Registered: Dec-07 | Tiger You must really like golf or you have an obsession with Tiger Woods. It is one thing to like golf but to kiss the ground he walks on. Come on. |
|
Silver Member Username: Tigger_woodsWONT BE GOLFING, UNTIL BUICK OPEN Post Number: 771 Registered: Jun-07 | HILLARY APPOINTMENT: THE AUDACITY OF BROKEN PROMISES By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN Published on DickMorris.com on November 18, 2008 Printer-Friendly Version If Barack Obama appoints Hillary Clinton as his Secretary of State, it will send a cynical message to his supporters: that change is something they can still only hope for. Because if Obama relies on this unqualified Washington insider to fill one of the most important positions in his 'outsider' administration, it will represent neither change nor hope, just more of the same. Instead of "Yes, We Can," Obama will be touting loud and clear: "No, we won't." A Clinton appointment would replace the audacity of hope with the audacity to shamelessly break campaign promises. As a president without any experience in foreign affairs himself, Obama needs a seasoned partner at State. And Hillary Clinton is definitely not that person - neither in substance nor in style. Hillary Clinton is the epitome of the entrenched Washington political establishment that Obama so effectively challenged and so thoroughly disdained. That's what makes her consideration so puzzling. But it's not just her old politics that should immediately disqualify her. With her out-of-control husband freelancing with foreign governments to raise money for his cronies, his foundation, and for speaking fees for himself, the potential for serious conflicts of interest are incalculable and dangerous. We don't know precisely what the former president has been up to; it's all secret. For more than eight years, Bill Clinton has adamantly refused to disclose the fat-cat donors to his library and foundation. Because of a computer error in the Clinton Library, the New York Sun inadvertently learned that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Dubai, the U.A.E, Kuwait, and Morocco have chipped in. But what about other governments or businesses? Can we actually afford to have a Secretary of State whose husband secretly raises money from foreign governments who have strong interests in U.S. foreign policy decisions? That's what we'd have with the Clintons. For Obama to choose Hillary would mean that he was ignoring the long overdue and strict ethical and professional standards that he claims will be imposed on all appointees. Or is Hillary going to have a separate standard of her own? A substantially lower one? Already, it appears that the Obama rule that "if you leak, you're gone" doesn't apply to Hillary. But does anyone really believe that Obama would appoint any other person to State whose spouse had publicly endorsed a controversial foreign leader for a U.N. position that the State Department opposed? That's just what Clinton did in the corrupt former Soviet state of Kazakhstan, where human rights violations are rampant. Clinton used his prestige as former President to set up a dinner meeting for Canadian billionaire Frank Giustra with President Nursultan Nazarbayev, known best for eliminating all opposition in his country. Giustra wanted to buy some of the country's valuable uranium rights. Although he had no experience in this region, two days later, Giustra was awarded a contract which the New York Times termed a "monster deal...[that] suddenly transformed the company into the world's largest uranium producers." During his very short visit, Clinton publicly promoted Nazarbayev for chairman of a U.N. committee - a position that the United States government, and his own wife, had vehemently opposed. That didn't stop Bill. And, it worked out well for him and his pal. After the deal was closed, Clinton's foundation received a $31 million contribution from Giustra and a pledge of another $100 million and half of all of his future mining profits. That's not peanuts. It was a win-win situation for everyone - except for the United States government's interests. Question: Did Kazakhstan also contribute to Clinton's foundation? And, if so, what did they want in return for it? Because there's more: While Hillary was a presidential candidate, Giustra arranged a meeting with a Kazakhstan government representative and Clinton at his Chappaqua home to discuss the government's plan to buy a 10% stake in Westinghouse. Now why would they want to talk to Bill about that? Did they feel that they had a special entrée to the former president? Sounds like it. Clinton initially denied any such meeting, but later admitted it after the government representative, who had coincidentally also handled the uranium matter, produced a photo clearly showing him at the Clinton home with the former president. Is this what the husband of a Secretary of State - or even a Senator - should be doing? Clandestinely meeting with representatives of oppressive regimes? Was he advising them about how to finesse their investment? The public needs to know what this was all about. Because one thing is for sure: Bill definitely won't change and there's no telling who else he's been hitting up for money. Remember his partnership with the Emir of Dubai and his other billionaire buddy Ron Burkle? He's already made more than $10 million on that deal and was secretly advising Dubai on how to get the Port Deal approved in Washington while Hillary was publicly opposing it. He helped the anti-Semitic Dubai create a public relations image as a modern Arab state while it kidnapped and enslaved three and four year old male children to use as camel jockeys. He's lobbied for other favorite projects, too. After he was paid $800,000 for speeches by Colombian Free Trade interests, the former president picked up the phone and called several democratic congressmen to advocate passage of the treaty. He's never registered as a lobbyist or a foreign agent, but that hasn't stopped him. Nor will it in the future. The potential problems are obvious. The husband of a Secretary of State cannot be in business with the head of a foreign country with growing interests in the U.S. Instead of a rogue co-president, Clinton would be a rogue co-Secretary of State. And that's something Obama can't afford. But aside from being the poster child of the status quo, Hillary is simply not qualified for the job. She has no foreign policy credentials, other than visiting eighty countries as First Lady, where she usually toured schools and hospitals with no diplomatic missions. And, of course, we know her assertions about dodging sniper fire in Bosnia and playing an important role in the Irish Peace Process were just fantasies. Some commentators suggest that the Secretary of State position has become a "woman's" seat and that Hillary is the logical next Secretary. But the previous women, Albright and Rice, were not ingénues who needed on the job training. Both were experienced diplomats with PhD's in their fields. Hillary had none of this background. She didn't even have national security clearance at the Clinton White House. Obama needs more than this. Finally, the colossal leaking by Clinton and her allies of her likely appointment, designed to box the President-elect into a corner, should teach Obama a lesson: the Clintons will try to outflank him on every turn and undermine him when he gets in their way. These are no partners for a new president to have on a world stage. So is the champion of hope and change going to appoint the woman that he derided as the ultimate apostle of the status quo, whose husband travels the world trailing clouds of conflicts of interest in his wake? Isn't that just what the old politicians would do? |
|
Silver Member Username: King_of_satsPost Number: 466 Registered: Jan-08 | Hey woods u big ole republican closet h0Mo no one give 2 chits about you lame azz politics go find some tr@nny boi site make a acount with u n@kid girl alias and have fun there cuz u chit old as hell |
|
Gold Member Username: PlymouthCanada Post Number: 5799 Registered: Jan-08 | Wip |
|
Silver Member Username: JojogunFairfield, CA United States Post Number: 464 Registered: Apr-06 | Dick Morris is a fagg*t who once worked as Bill Clinton's advisor and he jumped from being a democrat to being a republican...and he hasn't had nothing but bad things to say about the Clintons ever since. I wouldn't put any faith in any thing he says. |
Main Forums
Today's Posts- Home Audio Forum
- Home Video Forum
- Home Theater Forum
- Car Audio Forum
- Accessories Forum
- All Forum Topics