Viewsat vs sonicview

 

Bronze Member
Username: Elperrodemacao

Post Number: 54
Registered: Oct-05
I want to buy a fta reciever, but I'm not sure wich is better the viewsat ultra 2000 or the sonicview 360 sv premier.I need help please.
 

Silver Member
Username: Creek

Smithtown, New York

Post Number: 506
Registered: May-06
Buy the Viewsat.
 

Gold Member
Username: Plymouth

Quebec city, Quebec Canada

Post Number: 3278
Registered: Jan-08
Yes buy Viewsat much better support
 

Bronze Member
Username: Justforhahas

Post Number: 39
Registered: Jul-08
Totally disagree, and recommend the Sonicview (SV) 360 over the Viewsat (VS), and I have both. Much better pic quality and EPG, along with PVR with the SV.

VS does NOT have better support than the SV, and in fact the SV usually has fixes BEFORE the VS, if you were to track and record this as I have done, the past year.
 

Gold Member
Username: Plymouth

Quebec city, Quebec Canada

Post Number: 3281
Registered: Jan-08
King(justforhaha's)

Do not compared VS Xtreme with Ultra

Stop it! Ultra is a very good receiver with very good picture on 61" TV

Support is better on Vs
 

Silver Member
Username: Carburante

Post Number: 131
Registered: Jan-08
sonicview has better support and pic quality is large better than VS.personally i like CW.
 

Gold Member
Username: Gregraf

Post Number: 1052
Registered: Dec-07
Plymouth if you love King then say "no clue" in your post
 

Bronze Member
Username: Justforhahas

Post Number: 40
Registered: Jul-08
I am NOT King..and again you have no clue what you are talking about, as usual!

I'm sure you have NEVER even seen nor ever used any Sonicview, and speak without any knowledge of ANY other receivers other than "possibly" a VS. Also I have read your posts about VS and you are not even knowlegeable on those either. Your posts about deleting the keys were a real laugh.
 

Silver Member
Username: Carburante

Post Number: 132
Registered: Jan-08
sonicview has better support and pic quality is large better than VS.personally i like CW.
 

Gold Member
Username: Plymouth

Quebec city, Quebec Canada

Post Number: 3282
Registered: Jan-08
justforhaha's

Which VS?

Carburo
I have Vs and CW and Vs win on picture Quality and definition
 

Gold Member
Username: Plymouth

Quebec city, Quebec Canada

Post Number: 3283
Registered: Jan-08
Greg " no clue" it's King
 

Gold Member
Username: Plymouth

Quebec city, Quebec Canada

Post Number: 3284
Registered: Jan-08
justforhaha's
You compare a HD receiver, i agree with you on HD, but on SD NO
 

Silver Member
Username: Xtrawest

Canada

Post Number: 203
Registered: Nov-05
i got vs ultra and it got really nice pic quality over sonicview 360 that my frnd got. am not sure if u can with sonicview 4000 but with ultra we can edit the channel names. price of sonicview is little less than viewsat but support is kinda same.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Liger

Post Number: 24
Registered: May-08
FYI, Sonicview and Viewsat are both owned by Viewtech Inc. Different coders though.
 

Gold Member
Username: Kirankumar

NO Bashing

Post Number: 2905
Registered: Oct-07
sv is a better choice,support is good
vs has a lot of hardware problems
 

Silver Member
Username: Kingofdakingz

Post Number: 311
Registered: Jun-06
i have ultra on a 50' tv and its good and i agree that SV has support better then vs. the thing is SV bin releases first and after like 15 to 20 minutes VS releases. i like both. SV AND VS BOTH HAVE GOOD SUPPORT
 

Gold Member
Username: Donnie1973

Post Number: 3052
Registered: May-06
sv has released files WAY faster than any other reciever out there . week after week for a very long time. sv files are normally out within 4 hrs of an outage. sometimes vs waits all night to come out. they are second to sv. but u cant go wrong with either. imo
 

Gold Member
Username: Plymouth

Quebec city, Quebec Canada

Post Number: 3317
Registered: Jan-08
Lakh and Dantetn
Where you take files for SV?
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us