Bin 260 Question

 

New member
Username: Fudbaler387

Post Number: 4
Registered: Sep-07
i just downloaded the file folder of All 260 b75 bins, and there are 3 of them within the folder:

260_p122654_AIO
dans_260
Lothario_260_(B-75)

Which one should i use for my Pansat 2700C receiver and what is the difference between the 3 bins linsted above??
 

Silver Member
Username: Metallica

Post Number: 490
Registered: Jan-08
Pansat-C 2700 260v1 TiVo
http://www.ftabins.net/forumdisplay.php?f=129
 

New member
Username: Fudbaler387

Post Number: 5
Registered: Sep-07
what is the difference between that TiVo bin and the other 3 i listed above earlier?

is that one better or something and if yes, how?
 

Silver Member
Username: Metallica

Post Number: 491
Registered: Jan-08
I don't know about that 3..but i'm using the TiVo one it working great..
try all out see which 1 you like.
 

Silver Member
Username: Mkvl1490

Post Number: 143
Registered: Feb-06
i got the same question

which puff i choose from 2500a

nkk

fortec-pansat

lothario

saif bin

ukr
 

Silver Member
Username: Jwl1

Post Number: 259
Registered: May-06
260_p122654_AIO is report to be working great!
 

Gold Member
Username: Juancho

De los cerros mas alto..., BINDURABLE.

Post Number: 2815
Registered: Dec-06
all the 3 bines posted for
fudbaler387 are for converted
to 2700a receivers (B-75)
 

Gold Member
Username: Nydas

Post Number: 9673
Registered: Jun-06
Genuine Pansat 2700
x-87bl_080328_b75_260_api.bin

Clone Pansat 2700 manufactured as a 2700 clone
Pansat-C 2700 260v1 TiVo.bin.
Do NOT use on conversions. OK to use on genuine 2700.

Conversions: b75 Use any of the ones below
Lothario_260_(B-75).bin
dans_260.bin
jvvh_258(b75).bin (not working now)
These BINs will hence forward have the word b75 in the file name

Conversions: PUFF. Use any of the ones below
Jvvh_Fortec-Pansat_260_(PUFF).bin
Jvvh_260_Nkk_PUFF.bin
Lothario_260_PUFF.bin
Saif_Bin_260_Spaceblast_BG (PUFF).bin
Ukr_260-PUFF-.bin
These BINs will hence forward have the word PUFF in the file name

Conversions: PUFF_LZMA. Use any of the ones below
Jvvh_Fortec-Pansat_260_(LZMA).BIN
Jvvh_260_Nkk_LZMA.bin
Jvvh_260_LZMA.bin
Lothario_260_LZMA(PUFF.).bin
These BINs will henceforward have the word PUFF_LZMA of LZMA in the file name
 

Gold Member
Username: Juancho

De los cerros mas alto..., BINDURABLE.

Post Number: 2826
Registered: Dec-06
Do you went to nalyn box?.
that is what is causing confusion, to many bins,
loaders and how to for one STB.
For that reason the coders( whom
mods the 2700a .bin) will decide which one to use, wait for news from them,
 

Gold Member
Username: Nydas

Post Number: 9675
Registered: Jun-06
I have no affiliations.
So far Chancysand has come out strongly in favour of LZMA by producing LZMA_258 and LZMA_260 but none for plain PUFF since the PUFF_256.
I think UKR favours PUFF.

The public wants b75 to stay.

May the best method win.
 

Gold Member
Username: Juancho

De los cerros mas alto..., BINDURABLE.

Post Number: 2831
Registered: Dec-06
I don't believe you tested
260_P122654-AIO.
Do you know what system is use to mods the bin?. do you tell them that?.

I don't believe you , the ppl or me will decide which one is better, or we are the coders and them are the users.
 

Gold Member
Username: Nydas

Post Number: 9676
Registered: Jun-06
I did install 260_P122654-AIO more than 24 hurs ago when it was the nly b75 BIN avaialble and it is still running on the person's receiver - a Eaglestar.
I have the Fwank7 LZMA_260 running on another.
I wrote the instruction for conversion since b-75 version 220 or so and have kept up the latest instructions all the way through to 253 Puff introduction and then the LZMA introduction.
I went through the problems of various keyboards and solutions thereof with the first proper solution offered by P122654

I really do not want to argue with you. I simply state that as of now people are wanting b75 and with the 260 it is working, and that Chancy, one of the pioneers of modifying BINs has opted for LZMA in his last two releases. I don't want to ignore it as a casual decision.
And I do NOT have any affiliations.
 

Gold Member
Username: Juancho

De los cerros mas alto..., BINDURABLE.

Post Number: 2834
Registered: Dec-06
Do you read about the B-75
problems,some bines are likle time bomb, I don"t have afiliation,
I don't like to see many receivers(FLU) killed this
ways, no even BL did it.
That is why the mods wants to stop this killing..
The 260_p122654_AIO
is modded with the old sistem
before b-75, what could happens?.
maybe that is why so many receivers whith b75 boot need the
jtag
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us