Difference between Yamaha RX-V2400 & new RX-V2500?

Chris Wolcott New member Username: Os2dude Marietta , GA USA Post Number: 8 Registered: Jul-04	Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2004 - 03:00 GMT Besides the 2500 having 130W/C to the 2400's 120W/C (Watt/Channel), does anyone know the real differences between the two? I want a A/V receiver with multi-zone video and HDTV compatible component in/outs. In theory the 2400 has all that.
landroval Silver Member Username: Landroval Post Number: 730 Registered: Feb-04	Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2004 - 06:54 GMT The biggest difference is the pure direct mode, V2500 has it. Yamahas power ratings are always overrated so looking at the specs doesn't tell you much.
Nolema New member Username: Nolema PerthAustralia Post Number: 8 Registered: Sep-04	Posted on Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 04:37 GMT I bought the RX-V2400 in July. After a 3 month burn-in. I am 70% satisfied with it. But b4 u consider the RX-V2500, it'll be worthwhile to listen to the Marantz SR8300
EB1000 Unregistered guest	Posted on Monday, October 04, 2004 - 08:17 GMT the 2500 has many additional features, such as GUI (graphic user interface), user adjustable parametric equliser. Video switching between formats, now available for record outs as well (except component, which is only available for monitor out). The YPAO autocalibration was improved and is now error free. I'd go for the 2500.