Gold Member
Username: Pelona Perres,
California
Post Number: 1962 Registered: Dec-05
Posted on
Monday, March 05, 2007 - 23:55 GMT i heard the zx puts out exactly wut it says which means its exactly 1500watts n the sx puts out 1250watts but is underrated so it puts out more, so which one sounds better and has more watts? also why does the sx cost so much more than the zx? the sx costs $650 n the zx costs $470...is it because the sx has more features or more sound quality or wut
Gold Member
Username: Adddisorder West palm,
Florida
Post Number: 3617 Registered: Jan-06
Posted on
Tuesday, March 06, 2007 - 01:53 GMT i remember seeing that zx bench at 1950 somewhere. the sx cost so much becasue its digital
Gold Member
Username: Johnfiac IL
Afghanistan,...
Post Number: 1711 Registered: Mar-06
Posted on
Tuesday, March 06, 2007 - 08:47 GMT sx is the higher line of SQ amps i think
Gold Member
Username: Juliob Santo DomingoDominican Re...
Post Number: 4245 Registered: Dec-05
Posted on
Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 18:43 GMT SX is their best amp.
Gold Member
Username: Pelona Perres,
California
Post Number: 1964 Registered: Dec-05
Posted on
Sunday, March 11, 2007 - 19:11 GMT so the ZX puts out more power than the SX but the SX is more expensive because its digital?
Gold Member
Username: Adddisorder West palm,
Florida
Post Number: 3715 Registered: Jan-06
Posted on
Sunday, March 11, 2007 - 19:44 GMT yes
Gold Member
Username: Pelona Perres,
California
Post Number: 1973 Registered: Dec-05
Posted on
Friday, March 16, 2007 - 06:29 GMT alrite thats all i needed to know dope lol