Some Pioneer bullshit

SweatyOgre Silver Member Username: Sweatyogre Erie, PA USA Post Number: 123 Registered: Mar-06	Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 19:06 GMT I used to think Pioneer subs were pretty good, despite what people told me. Then yesterday my TS-W300R's surround decided to separate itself from the basket. You can imagine how that sounds flapping around. I learned my lesson, I'm ordering a pair of Alpine type S 12s.
ctmike Silver Member Username: Ctmike Ct. Post Number: 902 Registered: Feb-06	Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 19:13 GMT should have listened to people and saved your money but why not step it up from the type s to the r?
SweatyOgre Silver Member Username: Sweatyogre Erie, PA USA Post Number: 124 Registered: Mar-06	Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 19:31 GMT I was thinking about the type Rs, they're obviously better, but the 2 ohm DVC version I want is a little out of my price range, so I'm just gonna get the 2 ohm DVC type S's.
Jonez788 Silver Member Username: Jonez788 Marshalltown, Iowa Post Number: 187 Registered: Jun-04	Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 19:34 GMT Yeah, the Pioneer stuff sorta stinks until you get up into their Premier line, like the 3004SPLs and such, those are pretty good.
Casey Wood Gold Member Username: Southern_bass Paris, Tennessee U.S. Post Number: 2317 Registered: Dec-05	Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 21:14 GMT ct said why not get type r's .. heres how i see it ... sealed = type s , ported = type r
rob swingleman Silver Member Username: Theweasel Steamboat springs, Colorado U.S. of A Post Number: 437 Registered: Mar-06	Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 21:20 GMT sealed r's are better then the type s. the type s is just a hair better then the type e imo.
JC Silver Member Username: Camaro823 British Colu... Canada Post Number: 393 Registered: Jun-05	Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 22:08 GMT ^^^ agreed type e = type s, little difference

« Previous Thread Next Thread »

Main Forums

Forum Help

Follow Us