Which RE sub compares to a JL W6v2?

 

Silver Member
Username: Jprix82

Post Number: 264
Registered: Jan-06
Which RE sub compares to a JL W6v2?
 

Gold Member
Username: James1115

Ct

Post Number: 5341
Registered: Dec-04
in what SQ or SPL? I would say the se's are most comparable but they sound nothing alike.
 

Silver Member
Username: Jprix82

Post Number: 265
Registered: Jan-06
IDK my cousin loves the W6's but he cannot afford 1 but i would say he likes how loud they get so i would say SPL or SQL
 

Gold Member
Username: James1115

Ct

Post Number: 5344
Registered: Dec-04
RE sx
 

Silver Member
Username: Jprix82

Post Number: 266
Registered: Jan-06
"I would say the se's are most comparable but they sound nothing alike."

What do you mean by that?
 

Gold Member
Username: Jonathan_f

GA USA

Post Number: 5690
Registered: May-04
SEs are most comparable output-wise. The SX and XXX will get louder. Personally I like the SQ of W6v2s better than all of them.
 

Gold Member
Username: Suleman36

Maryland U.S.A.

Post Number: 3236
Registered: Feb-05
If you like the W6v2's SQ then look into the Image Dynamics IDQ series Subwoofers

http://www.imagedynamicsusa.com/products_page.php?id=idq&type=sub
 

Platinum Member
Username: Glasswolf

Wisteria, Lane USA

Post Number: 11344
Registered: Dec-03
The SE is on par with the W6v2
the XXX with the W7.
 

Silver Member
Username: Scott_debaker

Pittsburgh, P.A. U.S.A.

Post Number: 101
Registered: Feb-06
then what is with the sx
 

Silver Member
Username: Greeney1888

Maple Grove, MN United States

Post Number: 212
Registered: Feb-06
Most people say the SX is a SPL sub but i disagree. Id say the SX is a SQL sub. Has good SQ while getting very loud for a sub. I think most people who own a SX would agree with me on this one too.
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us