Paradigm Studio 60's

 

New member
Username: Stryvn

Post Number: 2
Registered: Dec-06
I am about to purchase a pair of Paradigm Studio 60v4 and I was hoping to get an opinion. I listened to them today and they sounded GREAT. The dude at the store there said the Adcom that was driving them was pushing 70w. I found that hard to believe. I have an Onkyo that's rated for 110w...is this going to be enough to drive these speakers?
Thanks guys!
 

Gold Member
Username: Hawk

Highlands Ranch, CO USA

Post Number: 1082
Registered: Dec-03
Scott:

Those are very nice speakers. If you get them, I am sure you will really enjoy them. However, I need to know, which Onkyo receiver?

Generally speaking, your Onkyo is not going to have the same power and authority that the Adcom amp has. This is the difference between a receiver and high quality seperates. Even though the salesperson estimated that they were only hitting 70 watt peaks, the smallest Adcom amp currently offered has 125 wpc (others have over 200wpc), and even then, Adcom amps are a lot more substantial sounding than Onkyo amps, simply because Adcoms have a much better power supply, capacitors and higher output transistors (simply put, Adcom watts are bigger than Onkyo watts). So, there is more "oomph" behind those 70 watt peaks.

However, that does not mean that the Onkyo is not up to the job--I just don't know. If you have an Onkyo A/V receiver, I would suggest that you keep it as a two channel so that you actually get your 110 watts and see if the speakers sound as good. I am sure that they will be reasonably close to the Adcoms used in a two channel arrangement. Unfortunutely, if you are using the Onkyo in a HT arrangement, driving 5 or more channels, bench tests will show that your Onkyo will probably only get about 50% of its rated power before the amp clips. Therefore, if you are getting a pair of Studio 60s and you are driving them with your Onkyo, you will get much better performance in stereo.

Later on, if you find something is still missing, you can easily add an Adcom power amp, using your Onkyo as a pre-amp.

Good luck!
 

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon USA

Post Number: 3822
Registered: Feb-05
Hawk is right. The Onkyo won't have the power nor will it present like the Adcom. Paradigm speakers are generally speaking a current hungry speaker with a wild impedence curve. This means you have to come to the dance with an amp capable of enough current to keep a good tight reign on the proceedings. The Adcom may not have been rated as powerful as your receiver (as the way they were measured is surely different) but it is a higher current and in effect more powerful amp. Hawk is also correct about getting better performance driving the 60's in stereo with the Onkyo. Hawk there was a smaller Adcom made recently I think (not sure) perhaps they still have one in the house. Anyway I will stick my neck out and state with certainty that the Onkyo will not have what it takes to get even half of the performance from the 60's that they are capable of. Sorry need more amp!
 

New member
Username: Stryvn

Post Number: 3
Registered: Dec-06
Thanks Hawk. I have an older (12 or 13 yrs) Onkyo TX-SV717PRO. It has Digital Dolby Pro Logic Surround Circuit (for whatever that's worth)and says the fronts drop to 85w when used in "Surround" mode. Having said that, I use it mostly for playing cd's- no HT. I guess I will see what I get when used in a 2-channel set-up and go from there.
Do you have a recommendation for a power amp to power up with this amp(should that need arise) or do I scratch the Onkyo and start fresh?
 

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 5468
Registered: Dec-04
Scott, that Onkyo will be fine with the Paradigms, as long as you don't goose the volume knob.
The problem is, I would goose the volume knob, and the result will be burned out paradigm tweeters. Guaranteed, in writing.

Spending your money is easy, from my seat, so go ahead and order up a Nad 162/272 pre/power amp set.

OOOOOr, an Outlaw rr2150 stereo receiver.
Or maybe a H/K 3340 stereo receiver.
Both have TT pre-amps, both are good.

There are more similar products out there, lets give Scott sommore to look at!
 

Gold Member
Username: Hawk

Highlands Ranch, CO USA

Post Number: 1087
Registered: Dec-03
Nuck:

why not just let him use his Onkyo as a pre-amp and add the NAD C272 power amp you suggest (or an Adcom)?

Art:

You are probably right about the lower powered Adcom. I seem to recall there was a lower powered Adcom, but when I went to the website, it is no longer showing in their product line. It didn't occur to me that the dealer nevertheless may have had one driving these speakers---nice call!

Scott:

All I can tell you is to try it. If you really liked the sound so much, just try them with your Onkyo and see if you get what you want. Art and I do agree that Adcom watts are bigger than Onkyo watts, so you will know that with better power, you can further improve your sound later on. But there is no way we can interpret whether the Onkyo has enough for your tastes, in your room. You can only determine that by trying them out at your home.
 

New member
Username: Stryvn

Post Number: 5
Registered: Dec-06
Nuck, I am interested in your opinion on Hawks question regarding using the Onkyo as a pre-amp and adding a power amp. Are the NAD and Onkyo going to play nice together?

Thanks, Hawk. If I'm understanding everything I am reading here lately, those 60's need more/better power to keep them focused. I am not against spending more to get the sound that I am looking for...I just don't want to throw good money after bad.
I spent the last 25 years with a couple of different Onkyo receivers and a pair of Cerwin Vega D7's that I completely abused. I loved the sound of the Vegas but I've also grown older and things change........

By the way, the wealth of information and the amount of talent/brainpower/knowledge spread around on this forum is incredible. Thanks to all who freely contribute!
 

Gold Member
Username: Stu_pitt

Irvington, New York USA

Post Number: 1567
Registered: May-05
Scott,

If you've got a few bucks to spend, look into Rotel's pre-amp/power amp seperates. They sound amazing with the Studio 60's. If I had the money and a room appropriate for the 60's, there would be no question in my mind where I'd start looking. Would other stuff sound better? Maybe, but it would cost significantly more money.

Just my opinions though. If you've got the money, time, and dealer who can pair them up for a demo, you shouldn't make any judgement until you hear that set up.
 

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 5525
Registered: Dec-04
Scott, I can't call the Onkyo/Nad from here, and even if I did, would it matter?
I trust Nad's amps.
However, I don't trusk Onkyo's pre amp.
If you use the Onkyo as a pre, I suggest you de-couple the power supply from the Onkyo's power section.
The Onk may use a j-fet output, or a mosfet array. Either will cause variations in the power supply, even without the load of output.

If you use the Onk as a pre, make it 100% preamp.


That and 35c will get you a phone call.
 

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 5526
Registered: Dec-04
AND, Scott, you might want to try the Rotel amps that Stuie mentioned.
Again, the rmb985 is a very available and cheap quality amp for your Onkyo.

Congrats on beating the hell out of the Vega's.
They love it!
So do I.
 

New member
Username: Stryvn

Post Number: 6
Registered: Dec-06
Nuck....in your honor, the first song thru the Studio 60's shall be from The King. Any one song over another you prefer for this ceremony?
 

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 5529
Registered: Dec-04
Hmmm...so many to choose from.

How about from the top, with 'That's all Right'?

Then a houndog chaser?

And I thank you for the honor, Scott.
 

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 5530
Registered: Dec-04
Gee, I really missed that one...
thank you, thank you verra much!
 

New member
Username: Stryvn

Post Number: 7
Registered: Dec-06
I've had the Onkyo and cd's boxed since August.....building a house. When I can move in (next week) the first order of business is the tunes. I'm definitely a novice with this stuff but music makes my world go round and I'm getting to a point where I can afford better stuff, and don't have that stubborn "as long as it plays loud" mentality that completely ignores quality. For now, I keep reading.
 

New member
Username: Stryvn

Post Number: 8
Registered: Dec-06
Nuck....I hate to keep buggin' you here, and I don't expect someone else to do ALL the work for me- But, I can't find info on the Rotel RMB 985 you spoke of. Is this model discontinued?
 

New member
Username: Stryvn

Post Number: 9
Registered: Dec-06
How about the RB-1070 @ $700?
 

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon USA

Post Number: 3829
Registered: Feb-05
How about it? It's a good amp...buy it!
 

New member
Username: Stryvn

Post Number: 10
Registered: Dec-06
So then I have a nice pair of speakers, and a good amp. My weakest link has become the pre amp. Have I at least eliminated the burned out tweeter problem when goosing the volume? Will the Onkyo suffice in this arrangement without damage to the Rotel or Paradigm's until I can eliminate the Onkyo part of the equation?
 

Silver Member
Username: Twebbz

Oakland Park, Florida USA

Post Number: 459
Registered: Apr-04
Scott, If you have not already purchased the Studio 60's($1,700) I would recommend you listen to the B&W DM604s3($1,400). They have a richness and depth of sound that I think is better than the STUDIO 100s($2,500). You'll find too that the soundstage is farther back with the Paradigms. Of course, It's personal preference all the way but I just bought the B&W's and I'm extremely impressed.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Stryvn

Post Number: 14
Registered: Dec-06
Thanks to all for your input. I listened to NAD and Rotel with the Paradigm 60's. I decided on the Rotel 1070 amp and pre-amp and 1080 tuner. Just waiting for delivery of the 60's and we can get the new home groovin'.
I'm sure my son will find good use for the old Onk. Perhaps a good rig for the garage.
 

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon USA

Post Number: 3849
Registered: Feb-05
Congrats Stryvn! Let us know what you think of the setup once you get it goin' at home.
 

Gold Member
Username: Arande2

400dB could probably d..., SouthWest Mi... Too Many DBs...

Post Number: 1005
Registered: Dec-06
Yeah I've heard the 60s enough to know they'll satisfy, although I'd probably force myself at the 100s, don't know why.
 

Silver Member
Username: Gavdawg

Post Number: 105
Registered: Nov-06
I am really starting to take your opinions with a grain of salt Andre.
 

Silver Member
Username: Gavdawg

Post Number: 106
Registered: Nov-06
for a self proclaimed bass fanatic, you should be able to notice that the studio 60's need a little bit of help in the lower register if you spent any amount of time with them. I am quite surprised they satisfied you

For the amount of bass you like (or claim to like, I can not figure it out), I really am totally shocked you liked the paradigm studio speakers, as they are really quite refined in that department, and not overbearing :-)
 

Gold Member
Username: Arande2

400dB could probably d..., SouthWest Mi... Too Many DBs...

Post Number: 1012
Registered: Dec-06
I think the reason I liked them so much is that I was playing a bass CD through them at high volume with that 200x5 Rotel amp and they handled it well. I also watched Van Helsing with them as mains and a Seismic 10 for the sub, it gave a great presentation. WHO SAYS IT'S OVERBEARING???? Who said I like loud bass, maybe what I mean is I like ultra deep bass at a realistic level...
 

Silver Member
Username: Gavdawg

Post Number: 109
Registered: Nov-06
that may be it... you may have issues with your wording

however, I still find it difficult to believe that you blew your seismic haha. It is just that I have never heard of this before.

Also, bass CD's are not what I consider a good reference point IMHO. Many of them are overblown and way too loud.

An acoustic bass or a piano in the lowest registers is IMHO one of the best references.

Techno and house music has pumped up (distorted) bass. While it can be fun to listen to, it is not what I would judge performance on.

HOWEVER, if that is predominately what you listen to, you need to take that into consideration, and choose speakers that perform well given the task at hand.
 

Gold Member
Username: Stu_pitt

Irvington, New York USA

Post Number: 1572
Registered: May-05
Stryvn -

That system is one of my favorites. It's very hard to fault it, especially at the price it costs. Each component on its own is pretty good. Together they're amazing. IMO, synergy in a system is pretty much the most important thing. That system's definitely got it.

If you think it sounds good, try adding a Pro-Ject Xpression turntable to that system. Simply phenominal.

If I had the proper room for it, that system would definately be on my short list.

Let us know how it goes.
 

Silver Member
Username: Gavdawg

Post Number: 122
Registered: Nov-06
Andre,

Art just informed me that he has also blown paradigm subs himself, so I apologise for jumping all over you :-)

I have been around here for some time. I deleted my account and re-registered, and dont ever remember it being mentioned.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Stryvn

Post Number: 15
Registered: Dec-06
A BIG FAT THANKS TO STU, HAWK, NUCK, ART!

I've had a few days with the new setup now and athough the "break-in" period for the Studio 60's is a form of torture (it's difficult to stay off the volume), I am really starting to appreciate this setup!

At first I thought the system was a nice improvement from the old Onkyo/Cerwin Vega system, BUT the sound seemed to me (an admitted amateur)to be a little bit hollow and not as warm as I recalled hearing at the shop I purchased the stuff from. I thought perhaps the room here at home was not quite right....I must admit a bit of disappointment at the thought of the room being "wrong" settled in.

Now, I don't know if it's my imagination or not but the speakers have "filled in" and smoothed out (if there is such a thing).
This system is awesome! I am VERY IMPRESSED.

Thanks for suggesting Rotel, Stu!!

Thanks to Nuck for talking me out of trying to use the Onkyo. The sad part of it is, I brought the manual for my Onkyo to the dealer who originally tried to sell me the Studio 60's. He said it would be fine and was still willing to sell me the 60's with that receiver. I was going to just upgrade my system by getting new speakers...I don't have any doubts that what you said about burned out tweeters is true. Thanks.
This was money well spent!

Again, thanks to all for steering me in the right direction.

By the way, I've also become addicted to reading the posts here and learning more about what makes this stuff tick.
 

Silver Member
Username: Gavdawg

Post Number: 196
Registered: Nov-06
Rotel gear does indeed go very well with the laid back nature of Paradigm speakers.
 

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 5674
Registered: Dec-04
Hey Stryvn!
Good to hear that you like the kit!
That Rotel/Paradigm combo is a classic!
Art had a combo before and it took a long time for him to find that synergy again.
You will likely have that system for like 30 yrs!

It really is a lot of fun to have someone follow up on advise that we put forward, let us spend the money and time, you get the short-cut to something worthwhile.

I hope you will stick around our little forum here.

Now about the cd player...
 

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 5675
Registered: Dec-04
And BTW, Stu put the Rotel's out there, not me.

Good stuff, Stu.

I thought that the Rotel pre would be out of budget, Stu put it all in line.

If I had 2k to put it together, Rotel would be #1.

They just Rock.
 

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon USA

Post Number: 3882
Registered: Feb-05
Sorry Gavin I blew those subs long before ecoustics.

Teamwork man...gotta love it!

Enjoy Stryvn!

Nuck...think we need a thread for music listeners over here that ain't polluted like the ones over at the Music forum...you know one for adults.
 

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 5681
Registered: Dec-04
You must be at least THIS tall to enter the music forum for Rock and Blues.
 

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon USA

Post Number: 3884
Registered: Feb-05
I'm listening to Merle Haggard ain't I THIS tall!
 

Silver Member
Username: Gavdawg

Post Number: 203
Registered: Nov-06
I was just playing Joyce Cooling on my iTunes. Smooth jazz guitarist.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Stryvn

Post Number: 16
Registered: Dec-06
Yes....about that cd player. I'm already eyeballing the RCD-1072. I've been cruising the cd forum looking for a bad word on this unit.....can't find one. It looks like Cambridge gets thrown around a lot too when someone is looking for a new cdp.

I always thought a cd player was a cd player. When I listened to 2 units side by side I was amazed at the difference in sound. I'm so naive. But I'm learning and having busloads of fun!! Where does it all end? I suppose when the bank account is empty.

And David Gilmour's On An Island is a peach.

Gotta run. Going to find a second job.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Stryvn

Post Number: 17
Registered: Dec-06
Get a second job or figure out a way to get on Andre's program.

Gotta run. Going to call Dad.
 

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 5729
Registered: Dec-04
hehehe.
You won't find a bad word on the 1072 from me, either. I love it!
The 1070 can be had a bit more reasonably, without the HDCD capability.

The price never seems to drop on these cdp's, but I would team up your super Rotel stuff with one of these players in a heartbeat.
 

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon USA

Post Number: 3898
Registered: Feb-05
Rotel with Rotel...good stuff!
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us