Mach 5 SPL 12

 

Gold Member
Username: Drivingreckless

DD 9515f, 148.2 db Mov...

Post Number: 4926
Registered: Apr-06
how are these subs? any one have expierence with them?
 

Gold Member
Username: Basssquared

Kansas

Post Number: 1674
Registered: Nov-06
i've had experience with your mom but thats about it sorry Dave
 

Gold Member
Username: Ctmike

Ct.

Post Number: 5570
Registered: Feb-06
i don't think anyone hear has even heard one, or even seen one.
 

Gold Member
Username: Drivingreckless

DD 9515f, 148.2 db Mov...

Post Number: 4927
Registered: Apr-06
figures right.
 

Silver Member
Username: Denim

Www.TeamSSAudio.com, MD

Post Number: 525
Registered: Nov-06
I tested the prototype, pictures and small POV was posted on both SSA and CA. Good strong driver, that can be used in a high power daily system, as well as an SPL install. I tested in 1.1 sealed, 2.0@27hz, 3.0@33hz, and 3.65@52hz. It favors the larger boxes and ported in design. It did not flinch at 2500-2700 watts, and the product model has two more spiders for higher abuse levels then the prototype I tested. Very heavy driver, and really should have 1200 or more watts on it to take advantage of its abilities.
 

Gold Member
Username: •cam•

BC Canada

Post Number: 1315
Registered: Nov-06
Which box did you like best for daily listening, Denim?
 

Silver Member
Username: Denim

Www.TeamSSAudio.com, MD

Post Number: 527
Registered: Nov-06
I felt that after the break in period, it was most at home in the 3.0 cube box. Does it need that big? No, it was fine in the 2.0, but seemed to wake up more in the larger box. It was down right nasty in the 3.65, but that was due to the peaky high tuning.
 

Silver Member
Username: Visitor

Middleofnowhere, Minnesota USA

Post Number: 146
Registered: Jul-07
i have one:-)very nice driver.
 

Silver Member
Username: Denim

Www.TeamSSAudio.com, MD

Post Number: 530
Registered: Nov-06
The only weakness of this driver, is the fact that Mach5 was built on mid-level power SQ based drivers for a great price. The SPL12 is a venture out to the other side of things. It is expensive to make and ship, but it can take a great deal of power and have plenty of composure for daily usage at a low tuning frequency. It is a very good option if someone wants something in the realm of a Fi BTL, but wants to try something different.
 

Silver Member
Username: Jemone

Stone Mountain, Georgia United States

Post Number: 270
Registered: Jan-06
Whats the minimum amount of watts u would recommend feeding it for daily use denim?
 

Silver Member
Username: Denim

Www.TeamSSAudio.com, MD

Post Number: 531
Registered: Nov-06
If you are going to buy a driver of this caliber, to get the benefits, I would suggest 1200-1500+. Does it need it? No. But it does have an rms of 2500 for a reason.
 

Silver Member
Username: Jemone

Stone Mountain, Georgia United States

Post Number: 272
Registered: Jan-06
That sub looks so ugly, I am scared of it. It looks like it might rob u at bass point!
 

Gold Member
Username: •cam•

BC Canada

Post Number: 1352
Registered: Nov-06
Haha. Ugly in a good way, I take it. Maybe when I get a newer Tracker, a pair might be nice.
 

Silver Member
Username: Denim

Www.TeamSSAudio.com, MD

Post Number: 533
Registered: Nov-06
The production model looks great in person.
 

Silver Member
Username: Vtouch06

Q-TowN, PiStoLvAniA

Post Number: 167
Registered: Nov-07
^ y is ur text in bold?? lol
 

Bronze Member
Username: Mrogowski

Post Number: 85
Registered: May-07
That's his trademark. Do the same and he will sue you.

The SPL-12 laughed at the 3kw music I threw at it. Denim is right though, you can get it going nicely with 300 watts, but don't sell yourself short on the power. You *will* want to send it more...
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us