SQ..SE or SX?

blaine westropp Gold Member Username: Blainew Post Number: 2399 Registered: Nov-05	Posted on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 - 07:06 GMT RE SE or SX...what has better SQ
Joe Blanford Gold Member Username: Jblanford Post Number: 1986 Registered: Oct-06	Posted on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 - 07:10 GMT se
blaine westropp Gold Member Username: Blainew Post Number: 2400 Registered: Nov-05	Posted on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 - 07:12 GMT you 150% positive?!
Joe Blanford Gold Member Username: Jblanford Post Number: 1987 Registered: Oct-06	Posted on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 - 08:23 GMT yessir...i've owned both
blaine westropp Gold Member Username: Blainew Post Number: 2401 Registered: Nov-05	Posted on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 - 17:03 GMT okay thanks
Chad Lee Platinum Member Username: Bestmankind ITS ALL ABOUT THE RL-S Post Number: 14338 Registered: Oct-05	Posted on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 - 17:08 GMT i back up what joe said by 150%. i've owned both also. lol.
blaine westropp Gold Member Username: Blainew Post Number: 2403 Registered: Nov-05	Posted on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 - 18:29 GMT i like the SX logo better tho
Scott Atwell Silver Member Username: Fi_car_audio Hades, NV Post Number: 209 Registered: Sep-06	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 00:22 GMT SE. Never really "owned" both but I designed them ;)
Joe Blanford Gold Member Username: Jblanford Post Number: 1996 Registered: Oct-06	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 00:25 GMT lol
Chad Lee Platinum Member Username: Bestmankind ITS ALL ABOUT THE RL-S Post Number: 14355 Registered: Oct-05	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 00:47 GMT lol scott.
Showrides Silver Member Username: Showrides Hartford, CT USA Post Number: 959 Registered: Feb-06	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 01:03 GMT SE hands down. I have owned both, and the Sx for sq is a bad idea.
blaine westropp Gold Member Username: Blainew Post Number: 2404 Registered: Nov-05	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 06:16 GMT is it okay that im gonna be running the SE at two ohms...on a nine.1...which will be 900 rms
Polo Gold Member Username: Safe_cracker Chicago, IL US Post Number: 3114 Registered: Jan-06	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 06:24 GMT Sorry but the SX is a good sounding sub, may not be as good as a SE but it can handle a lot more power (ran 2500 rms on mine) gets a lot louder and still sounds cleaner than a Mag, lmfao..Polo.
blaine westropp Gold Member Username: Blainew Post Number: 2405 Registered: Nov-05	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 06:30 GMT well then should i get an SX and run it on 1300 rms.... or an SE ON 900 RMS (but run it carefully)`
blaine westropp Gold Member Username: Blainew Post Number: 2406 Registered: Nov-05	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 06:31 GMT fu** it im getting an SE
Joe Blanford Gold Member Username: Jblanford Post Number: 2005 Registered: Oct-06	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 06:42 GMT SE is a nice woofer and can take LOTS of clean power "Sorry but the SX is a good sounding sub, may not be as good as a SE but it can handle a lot more power (ran 2500 rms on mine) gets a lot louder and still sounds cleaner than a Mag, lmfao..Polo. " something was definitely wrong with that lol
blaine westropp Gold Member Username: Blainew Post Number: 2407 Registered: Nov-05	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 06:50 GMT should i get it from here or now...... its the cheapest i couild find http://cgi.ebay.com/07-RE-AUDIO-SE-12-SE12-12-SUBWOOFER-US-AMPS-NEW-SUB_W0QQitem Z200128821900QQihZ010QQcategoryZ18803QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Polo Gold Member Username: Safe_cracker Chicago, IL US Post Number: 3115 Registered: Jan-06	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 06:52 GMT Gets a lot louder than a SE and still sounds cleaner than a Mag.
Joe Blanford Gold Member Username: Jblanford Post Number: 2007 Registered: Oct-06	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 06:57 GMT blaine you just missed out...i just sold me SE for 120 shipped
blaine westropp Gold Member Username: Blainew Post Number: 2408 Registered: Nov-05	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 14:58 GMT http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?ff3=4&pub=5574831155&toolid=10001&campid=5336746880&customid=&mpre=http%3A//cgi.ebay.com/07-RE-AUDIO- SE-12-SE12-12-SUBWOOFER-US-AMPS-NEW-SUB_W0QQitemZ200128821900QQihZ010QQcategoryZ 18803QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem do you think this is an okay place to buy it from
blaine westropp Gold Member Username: Blainew Post Number: 2409 Registered: Nov-05	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 18:01 GMT bump^
Joe Blanford Gold Member Username: Jblanford Post Number: 2011 Registered: Oct-06	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 18:05 GMT looks fine to me
ZpeedyrosaleZ A.K.A Mr.KingRob Gold Member Username: Extrmndor3 Post Number: 6275 Registered: Feb-06	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 18:06 GMT OMG re audio se is a SQ THAT GETS LOUD re audio sx is a sPL SUB THAT SOUNDS NICE case closed
blaine westropp Gold Member Username: Blainew Post Number: 2411 Registered: Nov-05	Posted on Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 18:17 GMT thanks
Polo Gold Member Username: Safe_cracker Chicago, IL US Post Number: 3121 Registered: Jan-06	Posted on Friday, July 20, 2007 - 00:45 GMT RE SX is an SQL sub, fact! Polo..
blaine westropp Gold Member Username: Blainew Post Number: 2416 Registered: Nov-05	Posted on Friday, July 20, 2007 - 00:51 GMT i just ordered the SE
Chad Lee Platinum Member Username: Bestmankind ITS ALL ABOUT THE RL-S Post Number: 14406 Registered: Oct-05	Posted on Friday, July 20, 2007 - 00:57 GMT the re sx definately is a nice sql sub. i played "take my breath away" on my sx18 and it sounded awesome.
Polo Gold Member Username: Safe_cracker Chicago, IL US Post Number: 3122 Registered: Jan-06	Posted on Friday, July 20, 2007 - 02:18 GMT

« Previous Thread Next Thread »

SQ..SE or SX?

Main Forums

Forum Help

Follow Us