Like

Why different qoutes on golden ratio for sub boxes?

 

Gold Member
Username: Insearchofbass

Post Number: 5687
Registered: Jun-04
radio shack book I have from 1994 says 1 1.6 .6
team toxic bass says
1 x 0.7937 x 1.2599

why the differences
 

Gold Member
Username: Tdeaton1021

Near Tampa, Florida USA

Post Number: 4331
Registered: Sep-04
good question to ask on the hexibase forum
 

Gold Member
Username: Insearchofbass

Post Number: 5690
Registered: Jun-04
k might do that trevor ....thanks ....hopin the box I just formulted using team toxic basses formula will fit
 

Gold Member
Username: Wingmanalive

A pic is worth 1000 posts!!

Post Number: 8446
Registered: Jun-06
Sean I have those same books. Bought them when I was in my early twenties. The fundamentals are right on, but as advancement in technology and products evolve, so does the "parameters". My books also state a 15%-18% increase in enclosure volume is possible due to damping. Today we see figures as high as 30+%. It's just a learning curve. The books I have are: "Advanced speaker systems" (1995) and "Building speaker systems, second edition with automotive" (1988).

I would assume ratios change as product and r&d improve.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Facebook

Shop Related Deals

Directory

Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us