Bronze Member Username: LilpimpdPost Number: 40 Registered: Jul-06 | are alpine type x's be consider sql or spl subs? and are they good? |
Platinum Member Username: BestmankindWww.15inchwangers.comFI Audio BTL Post Number: 10492 Registered: Oct-05 | sq. i wouldn't get those. they are power hungry and don't get that loud compared to alot of other subs. |
Silver Member Username: SpkrmanChi town, IL U S A Post Number: 181 Registered: Mar-06 | They are SQ woofers, and sound very very good ![]() Alot of mainstream haters on these boards, the X's are solid woofers. They are particularly strong on the low bass, awesome extension. For the cost they are a pretty good value. Once woofer you may want to check out, however, is the www.tcsounds.com tc-9, tonally one of the best woofs ive ever heard, but lacks the extension of the X. *do not* run the tc-9 sealed. |
Platinum Member Username: BestmankindWww.15inchwangers.comFI Audio BTL Post Number: 10494 Registered: Oct-05 | i just don't like them cause i used to own a pair. it does have nice sq but the output was just not enough. i don't hate on a brand unless i have heard it or have owned it before. |
Silver Member Username: SpkrmanChi town, IL U S A Post Number: 186 Registered: Mar-06 | a pair of type X 10's or 12's can potentially have quite a bit of output, thats up to the box ![]() They do need 1000-1500 each, though, but fed the proper power they are solid woofers. |
Platinum Member Username: BestmankindWww.15inchwangers.comFI Audio BTL Post Number: 10495 Registered: Oct-05 | you are right about the right box. but me and many others don't have your skills mark. so i am basing my opinion on a basic ported box built to alpine specs. i also had them in sealed. i gotta admit though, it did hit down low well and also the upper bass was nice too. |
Silver Member Username: Nd4spd18Post Number: 433 Registered: Jul-06 | I'd listen to Mark. I don't think anybody else or here or any forum for that matter knows more about alpine woofers. ![]() |