|
Silver Member Username: Denali_on_22sSSX, Tenneki US of A Post Number: 991 Registered: Feb-06 | I'm seriously buying one or the other within the next two weeks! What do you all think. Either one I go with will be in a 4.5 cu. ft. box tuned to 33 Hz. The MX would be run by a Hifonics BX1500, but the Q would probably be run by an SX1250.1 rated at 1435@1 ohm. Give me some opinions! Can the Q take that power daily? I could run the Q with the Hifonics as well. |
|
Gold Member Username: FrkkevinResonant Engineering..., Fort Worth... Email Post Number: 2858 Registered: Nov-05 | why would you run the MX with less power than the Q lol.. ive never heard a MX but ive heard good things about them.. but they are pricey.. i'd jump to the splbassx forum and snag that 05 XXX for $250 |
|
Gold Member Username: Denali_on_22sSSX, Tenneki US of A Post Number: 1007 Registered: Feb-06 | Haha, good question. Problem is I am considering trading my Solo X for a 1250.1, but if I do that I won't have money for the MX. If I do the trade then I could get a Q next week or the week after. If I sell my Solo X i'll buy the MX for 450 shipped and just power it with the amp I have. But what would you go with between the 2? |
|
Gold Member Username: Denali_on_22sSSX, Tenneki US of A Post Number: 1008 Registered: Feb-06 | bump |
|
Gold Member Username: Denali_on_22sSSX, Tenneki US of A Post Number: 1012 Registered: Feb-06 | not bumping? |
|
Gold Member Username: Denali_on_22sSSX, Tenneki US of A Post Number: 1017 Registered: Feb-06 | no help? |
|
Silver Member Username: LoudonPost Number: 751 Registered: Jun-04 | id do that .. that amp is powerhouse ur not using the solo x and that amp retails for 500 dollars new ... 400 used .. that ona q .. would sound outstanding |
|
Gold Member Username: Tdeaton1021Near Tampa, Florida USA Post Number: 3695 Registered: Sep-04 | that amp retails for like a grand new |
|
Gold Member Username: CenusHicksville, Ohio Post Number: 2844 Registered: Jan-05 | i would go with the mx>q but from your post i'd say the q and sx1250.1 would be more affordable. or you could be like every1 else and jump on the FI BL bandwagon. |
|
Gold Member Username: Denali_on_22sSSX, Tenneki US of A Post Number: 1032 Registered: Feb-06 | Problem is I'll have to save up to get the Q when I could just buy the MX now. The MX would still pound with the BX1500 on it so that's why I'm in a predicament. Not to mention the MX is crazy sexy! |