Opinions on 6.5 Componants? Infinity, Cerwin Vega others

 

Bronze Member
Username: Tafkam

Dayton, Oh

Post Number: 12
Registered: Apr-04
Hello, I plan on getting a Memphis 4 channel amp that will drive two sets of speakers, one of which will be 6.5 componants in the doors. This amp is 75 watts rms per channel, and I am condsidering Infinity Kappa Perfect, Cerwin Vega V-MAG 6502 or BLAUPUNKT TSc660 Oversize 6-1/2" Components. Lookin' on eBay of course!!

I would really appreciate any advice and if it makes a difference these will be going into a 99 Blazer Zr2. ONE OTHER follow up question, I had some Infinity Kappa 6x9 but found they would not fit in back mid panel, too deep. I want to get 6x9 also but if anyone knows of any aftermarket 6x9 that will fit with the factory panels, I would really appreciate knowing that too. I can't trust the Crutchfield "what fits" section as they said the Kappas would fit and they did not, way too deep!!!

Thanks
Mike
 

Gold Member
Username: Glasswolf

NorthWest, Michigan USA

Post Number: 2617
Registered: Dec-03
I'd go with the Kappa Perfect 6.1 set hands down

for the back, look at CDT perhaps?
or, better yet, forget rear fill, put subs in the back, and bridge the 4 channel amp to two channels, and drive the Infinity fronts with more power.
better soundstage that way too
 

Bronze Member
Username: Tafkam

Dayton, Oh

Post Number: 14
Registered: Apr-04
Thanks GlassWolf, I have heard the Infinity is the way to go, thought I would save some $ but again, you get what you pay for. You really think I would get better sound bridging the amp and putting all the power to the 6.5? I don't mean to doubt you but those speakers are really not that big, I thought I could get bigger sound by using the other channels to push some 6x9? And as far as the rear subs go, I have another post in the sub forum, I now have 2 10 inch and am trying to decide if I want to go with 2 12" or one (or possible 2) 15" or one REALLY GOOD 15, i.e. a stroker, any advise there would be much appreciated!!!!
 

Gold Member
Username: Glasswolf

NorthWest, Michigan USA

Post Number: 2622
Registered: Dec-03
once you have the subs, they should fill in for anything missing.
if you want a better midbass fill, consider a pair of 8" midbass drivers in the back, instead of full range speakers.
here's some info on rear fill:

While rear speakers might seem natural or necessary to some people, it is deemed undesirable and at best useless to those who are into good sound quality. There is nothing inherently evil about rear speakers, it's just that rear speakers often interfere too much with the ability of the front speakers to produce a believable sound stage and imaging characteristics. These effects can be minimized if care is taken to set up the rear speakers, but they are still there.

First, we discuss the "purist" view on rear speakers. Rear speakers grew out of necessity rather than the pursuit for better sound quality. A lot of cars, especially compacts and sub-compacts, have very small speaker openings in the front of the car due to space restrictions. It is rather rare to find a stock speaker location that can fit something as desirable as a 6.5 inch driver, while 4" and 4x6" speaker openings are quite popular. Small speakers are usually incapable of producing low bass (below 100Hz) at a satisfying level (say 90dB for casual listening.) Rear speaker mounting locations, especially the rear decks of sedans, offer a lot of area to mount a sizable driver, thus car manufactures rushed to mount large speakers in the rear to fill in the low bass region. This would have worked out if the stock stereos fed a low-pass filtered signal to the rear speakers so that they only produced the low bass frequencies, in which case those rear speakers would be called woofers or subwoofers. But no. Car manufactures didn't want to let all that volume go to waste so they fed the whole signal spectrum to the rear speakers. To make matters worse, the signal sent to the rear speakers is in stereo. The end result is that the center of the sound stage is somewhere to the far-right behind the driver and far-left behind the passenger. The instrument and vocal image floats all over the rear of the listener and shifts dramatically depending on the position of the listener's head. This is not how a live performance sounds.

For the reason discussed above, rear speakers of any configuration will intefere with the proper sound stage production and imaging of the front speakers. However, there are measures that can be taken to minimize the effect. The simplest thing to do is to turn down the rear speaker volume. Close your eyes, keep your head straight and adjust the front-rear fader control while you listen to a piece of music with strong central vocal content (check this with your home stereo or sit in the middle of the back seat with the rear volume turned all the way down.) First, turn the rear speaker volume all the way down, and then slowly turn it up until the vocal image starts to drift to the opposite side of the car. If you are sitting in the driver seat, listen for it to drift toward the passenger side and vice versa. This is the point where the rear speakers are still noticeable but it is not intefering too much with the proper operation of your front speakers.

There are two more things you can do but they require that you add components to your stereo system and the improvement is not as dramatic as simply turning down the rear speaker volume. Rear speakers should never be allowed to operate in full range unless you are going for the THX or Dolby Digital AC-3 theater surround sound setup. If you have a separate subwoofer, band-limit the signal going to the rear speakers to approximately between 200Hz and 3kHz. You don't need complex crossovers for this, just something like a 6dB per octave first-order high-pass filter at 300Hz and a 6dB per octave first-order low-pass filter at 2kHz. We're talking about one coil and one non-polarized electroly tic capacitor ($20 if you get the real snazzy stuff like polypropylene capacitors and low guage air core inductors). Minimizing the high frequency content of the signal fed to the rear speakers is much more important than the low frequency content. In fact, if you do not have a dedicated subwoofer, you can do without the 300Hz high-pass filter and let the rear speakers produce the bass frequencies. But keep in mind that rear speakers should have a lower relative volume than the front so the effectiveness of the rear speaker to double as a subwoofer is severely limited.

To wring out the last bit of negative side effects, the rear speakers should be in mono. This can be done only if you have an external amplifier. In other words, this is impossible with a stock stereo system. The simplest way to do this is if the amplifier has a stereo/mono switch built-in, or to use an amp that is bridgeable. Then just put the two speakers in series and bridge them across the amplifier. If the amp is not bridgeable, you will have to find a crossover or some other signal processor that has a mono output. However, most of the crossovers and signal processors only have mono output for subwoofers (music below 200Hz) and thus are not suitable for this purpose. So the simplest way to do this is to get an inexpensive bridgeable amplifier.

If you do decide to get rear speakers, you would have to decide which type or brand of speakers to get. After reading what's written above, if you think all this rear speaker negative side effect crap is hog wash, just pick out your rear speakers. But if you are now a faithful believer in low-volume band-limited mono rear speakers, read the next paragraph

Your cheapest and simplest solution is not to have ANY rear speakers. The next cheapest solution is to keep your stock rear speakers. The reasoning behind this is that most stock speakers are quite ok in the 200Hz to 3kHz region. It is in the bass and high frequency region where they run into trouble. Besides, you are going to be running it low-volume, band-limited and in mono, so the difference between a pair of stock rear speakers and say a $250 pair of high quality mid-bass drivers is not going to be all that noticeable. But again, it is important that you keep it low-volume, band-limited and in mono. If you have a lot of money (send me some) and really want a fancy spare-no-expense type of system, then go ahead and find a good solid pair of mid-bass speakers. DO NOT, I repeat DO NOT, I'll say it again DO NOT buy co-axials or component speakers to use as rear fill since you are going to be wasting a lot of money on the useless tweeter and crossovers. You might be rich but you don't have to be stupid. A $200 set of components or co-axials might be just so-so but a pair of $200 mid-bass drivers is going to be killer. A lot of companies make really good mid-bass drivers. Look into Kicker, JL, Boston Acoustics, MB Quart, Audax, or Morel just to mention a few. There are also a few high dollar brands such as Dynaudio, USD Audio, Image Dynamics and Focal. This is not an inclusive list because there are a LOT of good mid-bass drivers out there.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Tafkam

Dayton, Oh

Post Number: 15
Registered: Apr-04
Wow that is a lot of good advice and and I certainly appreciate it!! I thing I will not have a problem with the "rear fill" so I take it I should concentrate on subs? I have a Blazer, no prob with the space in the back, I have seperate ? under subs. Cerwin Vega Stroker 15 or two lesser 12's? Or maybe 2 12 inch strokers if I can afford it? Oh hell the possibility is conusing me at this point!!!!!!
 

Anonymous
 
For sound quality, I'd get a matching set of Infinity Kappa Perfect subs, they'll fill in very well. Push them with a good 600W-700W RMS amp, and they'll do great. Good one is a JBL 600.1. If you're looking to pound, there are good recommendations in the Subwoofer forum that'll give you a clue of what to consider. Personally, I'd go for sound quality with your Blazer since you can hear the subs better without the issue of "trunk bass"
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us