could someone plz put re audio's subs in order from least spl to most? including the new ones that they haven't put on their website (sr, mx) i alwayz thought the xxx was louder than the sx but sum1 said that wuznt rite. im guessin the order is re, rs, se, xxx, sx, mx, mt. is that rite?
i'm not sure about the newest subs, but this is how the 2005 line ranked in power handling:
RE, SE, SX, XXX, MT
the XXX was rated to handle more power, but the SX is more efficient. (ex, give them both 1000w and the SX would be louder)
if i'm not mistaken the RS line is supposed to be between the RE and SE lines...the new XXX is supposed to be their super SQL sub. and the MX is totally new animal.
i dunno if that would be enough unless u had an @ss load of batteries
Anonymous
Posted on
the X.x.X defintaely has more spl than the SX with the right right power for each sub. The X.x.X has the xbl^2 motor. i have an X.X.X and a friend has the SX, both of us have the same amp with 1200 watts, and there is no comparison.
i have a re sx 15'' , just not hooked up yet , ive heard a 12'' sx with a some memphis 1100 watt amp in a silverado ext. cab , they get very loud and sound alot better than you would think
