MTX or Fosgate

 

Anonymous
 
if you had to choose wich of the two would be better.
 

Silver Member
Username: Byrumjr

Post Number: 199
Registered: Jan-05
I would take the MTX over Fosgate. First Fosgate amps are more money for less real watts than MTX amps. Next Fosgate amps run hotter than MTX amps. The Fosgate amps might be built a little better and they look a lot better than the new MTX amps.
 

Silver Member
Username: Importrapist

Savannah, GA U.S.A

Post Number: 160
Registered: Mar-05
All i know is, i see alot more RF amps in competition cars than MTX........
 

Gold Member
Username: Taylor17

Kopperl, Texas

Post Number: 1428
Registered: Jan-05
Both are really good amp's.
With that said, I would go with the Rockford. Sure it is a little more money, but in my apinion, it is 1 step abuv MTX.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Atomoswav

Post Number: 17
Registered: Jan-05
For the money, MTX makes a great amp. I don't think there is anything wrong with fosgate, aside from being a little overpriced.

Also, some people don't like their newer amps because they aren't as good as their older amps. I guess they feel the company let them down.
 

Gold Member
Username: Taylor17

Kopperl, Texas

Post Number: 1478
Registered: Jan-05
Everyone says that, but I haven't seen any proof to back that up.
On RF's website, it shows the spec's of the old mottle, then the specs of the new mottle. There isn't much of a difference, if any, the new ones have been improved.
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us