|
Unregistered guest | http://www.mtxaudio.com/smoked/MTXWooferSVH.mov dont ever say mtx sucks ever. they maxed out their ac generator at 142 VOLTS! you could plug this sub into a facking wall! 120vac 180 peak, surely it wouldnt draw the peak power though damn |
|
Silver Member Username: TheelfkeeperStockbridge, GA USA Post Number: 160 Registered: Feb-05 | "Smoking the Competition"...but still sounds like sh it. not to mention, does that test even have anything to do with being played in a car?? |
|
Bronze Member Username: BigdanmanThe OC, CA USA Post Number: 17 Registered: Mar-05 | i have to agree with brandon. raw power handling doesnt mean how good a sub is. the w7 still will have better sq and better spl than the mtx. funny how they didnt put up the soloX. |
|
Bronze Member Username: Joe_cOakwood, Ga Post Number: 87 Registered: Mar-05 | yeah or brahma or x.x.x or memphis and who would be stupid enough to run all that with no box, mtx was good in the 90's? 80's? nevermind mtx sux |
|
Silver Member Username: SolacedagonyNew Jersey US Post Number: 328 Registered: Oct-04 | MTX doesn't make the SoloX, Kicker does. And destroying your sub by plugging it into an outlet has what to do with anything? Besides wasting money. |
|
Silver Member Username: JohnnylemoineLaPlace, Louisiana United States Post Number: 470 Registered: Aug-04 | i think he knows that MTX doesnt make the solo X, hes saying that they didnt use a soloX against the 9500, they used an L7. and im pretty sure they said they used amps to push the subs. crown marco tech 5002vz amplifiers. but still, F*CK MTX! lol |