|
New member Username: MtxnellPost Number: 1 Registered: Jul-04 | which is the better sub??????? mtx 9500 or 13 w7 |
|
Bronze Member Username: Pkilla21Post Number: 31 Registered: Jun-04 | 13 w7 |
|
Silver Member Username: Its_bacon12Hfl, Ny Usa Post Number: 801 Registered: Dec-03 | def 13w7 |
|
Bronze Member Username: CalisouthernerPost Number: 11 Registered: Jun-04 | more explaination please? I'm prettty sure the jl is better but what technical term? The only down side I see jl is price tho, it take an arm and a leg for it. |
|
Bronze Member Username: CalisouthernerPost Number: 12 Registered: Jun-04 | more explaination please? I'm prettty sure the jl is better but what technical term? The only down side I see jl is price tho, it take an arm and a leg for it. |
|
Bronze Member Username: Purplehase_bongBc Canada Post Number: 92 Registered: Apr-04 | check this out http://www.sounddomain.com/brand?id=JLA |
|
Gold Member Username: GlasswolfNorthWest, Michigan USA Post Number: 3926 Registered: Dec-03 | this question was discussed not long ago on here as well in a thred that ran well over 100 posts. The MTX comparison uses the smallest of the JL W7 subs. What they don't tell you is that the MTX line of subs doesn't improve Xmax as the diameter of the driver increases whereas the JL does, and by a large amount. a 13W7 will destroy a 9512 in both SPL due to it's superior displacement, and in SQ due to being a much better sub. You pay for that difference though since the JL is considerably more expensive so it's a simple matter of getting what you pay for. Both are good subs, but side by side, the JL is the better performer. |
|
New member Username: Colorblind_2004Post Number: 9 Registered: Jul-04 | Well, my friend has 2 Thunder9500 subs and they are loud as hell and hit so f*ckin hard, i cant even talk while im ridin with him! But I hear W7's are better. So i dont know, just lettin you know that MTX is still pretty good even though they might not be as good. |