13w7 vs. Two RE SE 12s

cal payne Gold Member Username: Skibum12189 Cleveland Post Number: 2497 Registered: Mar-06	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:10 GMT Running of a Nine.1 both would be ported. Which would you take? Also, i know most hate this question, but which would get louder?
Mike Loudon Gold Member Username: Loudon Post Number: 2227 Registered: Jun-04	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:17 GMT id take neither personally
cal payne Gold Member Username: Skibum12189 Cleveland Post Number: 2499 Registered: Mar-06	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:30 GMT what would you take besides those?
Mark Scafetta Silver Member Username: Mendonmafia USA Post Number: 833 Registered: Aug-06	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:34 GMT in terms of spl i would have to go with the 12's. more cone area. the se's cost ALOT less to, so thats probably what i would take. i dont think i would ever buy a dub7. to many other, cheaper options.
Reece Brassler Gold Member Username: Denali_on_22s Post Number: 3663 Registered: Feb-06	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:35 GMT the nine.1 wouldn't push enough power for the W7. no one notices, but it's RMS is 1500 watts. That nine.1 at 3 ohms will probably produce around 675 watts... less than half the power the W7 needs. so basically i don't really think you have a choice. it's the RE SE's or a new idea.
Zpeedy McLovin Gold Member Username: Extrmndor3 Http://illuzonemu.serv..., ^^^Sick Game Post Number: 7572 Registered: Feb-06	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:36 GMT ill take the jl.. and one of the facts that i will have a 13w7 in the back.. umm good
No Limit Soldier Silver Member Username: Ska Post Number: 173 Registered: Jan-08	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:39 GMT i'd take RE, JL is over rated
Zpeedy McLovin Gold Member Username: Extrmndor3 Http://illuzonemu.serv..., ^^^Sick Game Post Number: 7573 Registered: Feb-06	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:41 GMT what????????? overated?? expensive is another thing.. and originality and exclusive is expensive... thats why but i wil never say jl is overated
Joey DeSalvo Gold Member Username: 420alldaylong Post Number: 3212 Registered: Sep-06	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:43 GMT JL is not overated its overpriced. And I would jump on the RE SE's.
Abarca Silver Member Username: Drant19 DUB-C, TX Post Number: 254 Registered: Aug-07	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:44 GMT i wish i had the money for JL lol...but reece brassler brings up a good point. that amp will not give a 13w7 enough power for you to see it really shine. go with the RE SE's
Mike Loudon Gold Member Username: Loudon Post Number: 2229 Registered: Jun-04	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:47 GMT im personally not a fan of SE's ... they sound alright but the output isnt what i expected W7s are great woofers ... but they sound muddy .. not a fan of their sq .. loud but sq not so much in my opinion
Reece Brassler Gold Member Username: Denali_on_22s Post Number: 3668 Registered: Feb-06	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:47 GMT that 13W7 would laugh at 675 watts. not to mention it wouldn't sound nearly as good.
cal payne Gold Member Username: Skibum12189 Cleveland Post Number: 2502 Registered: Mar-06	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:47 GMT Well, actually reece i talked to the ED techs and they said at 3 ohms, the nine.1 is pushing 900 rms at 13.9 volts (my car's resting) which is plenty considering it's actually rated at 1000 and blaine westropp on here has a 13w7 on a nine.1 and it slams. i'm not going for spl either, i just want some nice clean sounding bass. I've heard a 13w7 sealed and ported, a 12w7 HO box, and a single RE SE 12 sealed, and I liked the 13w7 ported the most, but the SE seemed to sound clean and get loud. I can get the 13w7 for like 370 too, the SE's would run about 325 a pair.
JayZ4Prez Gold Member Username: Mj23dynasty They Love 2 Hate Me, Most Hated a... USA Post Number: 1144 Registered: Oct-07	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:49 GMT Yes RE SE I am deeply in love with them if I dnt like the dd's I'm selling them and getting the SE's in a heart beat
cal payne Gold Member Username: Skibum12189 Cleveland Post Number: 2503 Registered: Mar-06	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:49 GMT mike, do you think se's sound cleaner than w7's?
Reece Brassler Gold Member Username: Denali_on_22s Post Number: 3669 Registered: Feb-06	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 00:54 GMT the 13 W7 is 1500 rms, bud. check the site. as for the nine.1 i forgot it was rated a 12.5v i would still put more power to it.
nickyp0219 Silver Member Username: Nickyp0219 Post Number: 388 Registered: Jun-06	Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 01:00 GMT 13W7 DRIVER SPECIFICATIONS 13W7-D1.5 Free Air Resonance (Fs): 23.5 Hz Electrical "Q" (Qes): 0.476 Mechanical "Q" (Qms): 7.517 Total Speaker "Q" (Qts): 0.448 Equivalent Compliance (Vas): 3.68 cu. ft. / 104.3 liters One-Way, Linear Excursion (Xmax): 1.25 in. / 32 mm Reference Efficiency (no): 0.269% Efficiency (1W/1m): 86.3 dB SPL Effective Piston Area (Sd): 107.35 sq. in. / 0.0693 sq. m DC Resistance (Re): 2.41 ohm** Nominal Impedance (Znom): Dual 1.5 ohm Thermal Power Handling (Pt): 1500W Driver Displacement: 0.21 cu. ft. / 5.9 liters Net Weight: 52 lbs. / 23.6 kg

« Previous Thread Next Thread »

Main Forums

Forum Help

Follow Us