I am looking to purchace a Profile CL600M amp to power an Image Dynamics 12" dual 4 Ohm sub. they both seem like real good deals but cheap isnt always quality so is this worth the money?
Monday, September 06, 2004 - 19:19 GMT
Bronze MemberUsername: Sancho886
Post Number: 15 Registered: Jun-04
Tuesday, September 07, 2004 - 19:51 GMT http://p079.ezboard.com/fcaraudiotalkfrm27.showMessage?topicID=48.topic
go with the Profile AP2000 300 x 2 RMS at 4 omhs;
Monday, September 13, 2004 - 02:39 GMT 900 plus watts bridged...........I have one powering one 15, it will slam. The damping factor is 290; "not a zapco but not bad"
Silver MemberUsername: Caraudiofng
Post Number: 272 Registered: Aug-04
Hifonics or JBL will good inexpensive alternatives. Most people on here will not suggest Profile, Lanzar, Pyle, Boss, Soundstorm, Sony, Audiobahn, etc.
Monday, September 13, 2004 - 03:57 GMT
Why do you not recommend the Profile Amps?
Thursday, September 16, 2004 - 20:45 GMT They seem to have better THD than most of the competition and better Signal to Noise Ratio? Do they have heat problems or something?
Silver MemberUsername: A3forme
Post Number: 116 Registered: Sep-04
Yes, heat would be one of the big problems. They are horirble amps. They are not durable nor reliable. They're the kind that turn over after 30 minutes because they overheat. CRAP CRAP CRAP!!!!!
Thursday, September 16, 2004 - 23:19 GMT
Silver MemberUsername: Insearchofbass
Post Number: 556 Registered: Jun-04
my cousin has the profile 400 on a kicker comp 12 (lowest line) and the amp does get hot but never shuts off on us but i wouldnt suggest these amp just because of how hot they get
Friday, September 17, 2004 - 13:05 GMT
my last system i had was a pure excelon system. any way i need to put together a system for my 01 f150 super crew, i can fit either a single 10" or dual 8". I'm leaning toward the 8's due to having more surface area. I want a very tight and clear bass this system. any suggestions for subs and a decent amp (since profiles are crap)
Friday, September 17, 2004 - 16:21 GMT Thanks