With pocket-size point-and-shoot cameras peaking, camera makers have emerged from their R&D labs with a new generation of hybrids: mutants with superior vision. These cameras blend the simple controls of pocket models with high-quality optics and advanced features typically offered only on digital single-lens reflex units. The unfortunate moniker given to these cameras? Megazooms.
These units' defining features are larger lenses and high-power optical zooms. You also get manual control over ISO settings, aperture, and shutter speed. Don't expect to slip one of these behemoths into a pocket. These chunkier models fit in a camera bag or camping pack.
We tested six newer megazooms, from Canon, Casio, Fuji, Olympus, Panasonic, and Sony (the Canon is actually a 2007 model; the company hasn't yet announced an updated version for 2008). Another contender, Nikon's new Coolpix P80, was released too late to make our tests; an online review is planned.
Many megazooms add image stabilization to the lens; and if ever you need image stabilization, it's when you're zoomed in on a far-away subject. That's because the greater the magnification you're using, the less movement it takes to blur a shot. Even with image stabilization, you should use a tripod, especially in low light.
Want high-end features? The slow-motion mode in Casio's Exilim Pro EX-F1 shoots 60 full-resolution photos per second and (much-lower-resolution) video at 1200 frames per second. The EX-F1 can also capture 1080i high-definition video, making it a great hybrid of a still and video camera.
A megazoom's responsiveness (how quickly the camera takes the picture after you press the shutter release button) falls short of a digital SLR's lightning-fast reaction. Nevertheless, these plus-size point-and-shoots bring you close to the experience of using a digital SLR, and they do so for much less dough.
Here's how the ratings of these cameras stacked up as of June 2008. For the latest version, see our Top-Rated Advanced Point-and-Shoots chart.
Megazooms didn't emerge out of an economic vacuum: Businesses and individuals have a need for their combination of features.
Like smaller point-and-shoots, megazooms are far less expensive than SLR cameras, yet they also have advantages beyond mere price: They're simpler to use, less burdensome to lug around, and great for taking photos. The 10-megapixel CCD on some models means there's even a bit of room to magnify an image if you need to go beyond the maximum optical zoom and use the digital zoom as well. The cameras can also shoot video, which an SLR can't do.
The big disadvantage of the megazooms--their bulkiness--isn't dramatic; schlepping one around is just slightly more of a hassle.
Who needs a megazoom? Home inspectors, contractors, insurance agents, and real estate agents stand to gain from using the long-distance zoom--photographing a roof defect from the street, for instance, to save a trip up a ladder. Many models offer a macro feature that lets you place the lens inches from the photographic subject. Car insurance adjusters would get mileage from that.
Nature and wildlife photography is another match for megazooms: When photographing skittish (or dangerous) wildlife, for example, you can keep your distance and still get a decent shot.
The one thing that megazoom cameras struggle with is jerky motion. Though several models include image stabilization, you can't depend on that alone to block the blur--so a tripod is a must.
Megazoom cameras aren't the perfect fit for everyone or every situation, but they definitely have a target audience. Are you in that group? Here are some criteria to consider in deciding which class of camera is right for your needs.
| Digital SLR | Point-and-shoot | Megazoom |
|---|---|---|
| Why to buy: You need a really quick shutter to photograph fast-moving targets. You want precise control over your shots. You want access to a variety of lens options. You're looking for a very durable camera. You want or need to use fine-art features such as multiple exposures. Why not to buy: You need something light, beginner-friendly, compact, or inexpensive. |
Why to buy: Small size and ease of use are the two most important considerations you are weighing. Neither zoom nor manual controls factor into your needs. Why not to buy: You need to use a relatively advanced camera-one that offers greater responsiveness, more manual controls, and/or a higher-quality image than you can get with a point-and-shoot model. |
Why to buy: You want to capture image details from a relatively long distance with a high-megapixel camera. You need manual controls, but not enough to justify paying a premium for a full digital SLR camera. Why not to buy: Your photographic needs are met by a smaller or less costly camera. The only real appeal these models have for you is that you like saying "megazoom." |
Andrew Brandt, Dave Carroll, Paul Jasper, Andrew Mager, and Danny Palmerlee
