Home > Consumer Reviews > Panasonic CQ-DF783U Car CD/ MP3 Player

Panasonic CQ-DF783U Car CD/ MP3 Player

See all offers at Shopping.com for $0.00

Average User Rating

(3.60 out of 5) from 7 reviews

Epinions User Reviews

Newest First | Highest Ratings First | + Share

Excellent product for the money! Recommended!

(4.00 out of 5) by howyalikemenow on Jul 12, 2005

Pros: Ample illumination for display! This thing is BRIGHT! Panasonic reliability. Plays wide range of CDR/CDRW.
Cons: Cannot display clock and song titles at the same time. No scroll speed adjustment.
The Bottom Line: Good solid value for the money! Does what it does and does it best! Panasonic reliability!

I was looking for something relatively cheap, but not cheap in quality, that plays MP3s! The Panason ...
Read the full review


looks good, but could be more for the money

(4.00 out of 5) by slabrider on May 27, 2004

Pros: Looks cool, inexpensive, knob volume control, reads scratched discs better than the jvc
Cons: two band eq, too bright, poor bass response, takes too long to read mp3 cds

I bought this mp3-cd player to go into my second car, so I have been able to get a good comparison b ...
Read the full review


Best bargain you'll find

(5.00 out of 5) by mrkangfu on Apr 11, 2004

Pros: Looks, price, extensive feature list.
Cons: Slow reading sometimes, slow scrolling.

Boy is this one a looker. Day or night this head unit attracts a lot of attention. It has a cool blu ...
Read the full review


Great sounding Unit!

(5.00 out of 5) by kspriss on Feb 23, 2004

Pros: Sound!!!, MP3/WMA support,
Cons: Display too bright!
The Bottom Line: Reccomended for sound quality and features!

I got this unit because I wanted something with a line-in jack (for my Minidiscs), Changer controls, ...
Read the full review


Same Firmware As 383

(1.00 out of 5) by panasonacsuck on Oct 7, 2003

Pros: Looks nice, it isn't hard on the eyes, girls like the look.
Cons: Slow, Brightness settings suck, skips, slow text/song changes.

I used to own the 383 version (lower, lower model). Anyways it was too slow for me and had no sub ou ...
Read the full review