Food for thought.....

 

Silver Member
Username: Tombo777

Post Number: 297
Registered: Jul-05
Just some food for thought. Mits claims that cost per unit (avg. worldwide)on CRT RP shipping/insurance that they end up eating for any bigger dealers comes down to around $110 per tv but the DLP sets cost them $40. Also consider that profit in a Micro is on average 10 points higher than CRT (1/4 to 1/5) more profit per retail dollar. This is what drives the getting out of CRT more than anything else. Last thing. No BETTER time to pull of a very less than perfected technology for more $$ than when customers are hooking them & seeing them demo'd with a signal up to 200% better than they have ever seen before and they are so light weight to boot!
Who would not want one, right? Bugs to the light
 

yawn
Unregistered guest
Whoopteedoo...
 

Silver Member
Username: Tombo777

Post Number: 300
Registered: Jul-05
read it and weep!
 

bong is a fraud
Unregistered guest
Anonymous

Posted on Thursday, September 01, 2005 - 12:41am

Quotes from the link that tom bong posted in the samsung problems thread:

"In the old days, color imaging was accomplished by tickling phosphors with an electron gun. Surprisingly, this system produced (and continues to produce) the most life-like images of all, which is why CRT front projectors are still preferred by a small number of high-end customers for home theater applications."

"That's because CRTs are capable of a wide grayscale and can show images with very low luminance levels (shadow detail) as well as very high luminance levels (highlights) in the same scene. More importantly, when a CRT is idling, it is essentially shut off. I mean REALLY shut off, as in black. Not a deep gray, as you'll see with LCD, DLP, and LCoS projectors and AM LCD and plasma monitors."

If you ask people who really know this technology, they will tell you that a properly calibrated CRT is the reference that all others are measured by.

http://www.hdtvexpert.com/pages/shmontrast.htm


A 2003 article that groups DLP black levels in with LCD and Plasma isn't very credible. Everyone knows that DLP black levels are matching CRT black levels while LCD is still unable to.

Using wording from a 2003 article as your own is pretty lame. It's pure plagiarism. It's misleading and outdated.

This proves beyond doubt that tom bong is a fraud.

« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us