Which should I build...which is faster

sean Gold Member Username: Insearchofbass Post Number: 7657 Registered: Jun-04	Posted on Saturday, January 26, 2008 - 20:05 GMT a single intel celron 2.93 or a 2.0 intel dual core....would the 2.93 be faster or not considering its 930 mghz faster
Derek Horn Bronze Member Username: Tycoonbob Post Number: 70 Registered: May-07	Posted on Saturday, January 26, 2008 - 20:55 GMT 2.0 dual core would be much faster. and running multiple programs at once would be a hell of a lot smoother.
sean Gold Member Username: Insearchofbass Post Number: 7681 Registered: Jun-04	Posted on Sunday, January 27, 2008 - 14:47 GMT just so people know why i asked ....its because I heard the second cpu is only used 30% effectively in windows
Chuck Bronze Member Username: Amish Riverside, CA Post Number: 16 Registered: Jan-08	Posted on Monday, February 04, 2008 - 21:56 GMT the dual core is better.
Shawn Gladwin New member Username: Navyvet Post Number: 7 Registered: Feb-08	Posted on Sunday, February 17, 2008 - 00:05 GMT Total agreement, Dual core will blow the celeron out of the water for more reasons than just the Mhz rating. No one should waste money on a celeron in my opinion.