Home > Consumer Reviews > Sky Universal Remote Control - White

Sky Universal Remote Control - White

See it at Amazon.co.uk for £4.90

Average Customer Rating
(3.5 out of 5)

Amazon Customer Reviews

Most Helpful First | Newest First | + Share
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:

Sky remote control

(5 out of 5) by Rob Smith on Dec 6, 2007 (North Wales)
This is the remote that works all the Sky Digital Receivers, it is the silver/white version easy to use, nice clear display, with good size buttons.

This is not the Sky Plus remote you will need a Sky 110 remote for Sky+.

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:

Perfect replacement

(5 out of 5) by B. M. Clegg on Jul 18, 2007 (Wiltshire, England)
You can quibble about how good (or not) the Sky+ remote is - but that's not the point. This is a proper Sky+ remote at a fraction of the cost of buying one in other shops, delivered quickly and doing the job. Excellent.

5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:

Batteries last longer than the remote

(1 out of 5) by K. Brown on Apr 29, 2008 (UK)
Perfect replacement for a sky remote, except they don't last.
1st one lasted all of 2 weeks.
2nd one lasted just over 2 months.
I am now tryig to arrange another replacement. BUYER beware!

1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:

Defective item

(1 out of 5) by D. Clark on Oct 3, 2008 (London, UK)
Looking forward to getting my new, upgrade Sky remote - only to find that the volume control doesn't work! Now sending back for a refund :-(

3 of 13 people found the following review helpful:

Good enough, but should be getting smaller............

(3 out of 5) by Dino Amore' on Dec 30, 2006 (Hadleigh, Essex)
Having upgraded to SKY+ recently, I was very impressed with the new box, and kind of expected the remotes to be better also, but no cigar.
Don't get me wrong; these remotes are well laid out, easy to use, colour coded, and have big buttons. All good. But when I have an IPOD Nano, and a new CD sound system, which are both tiny compared to systems of a year or two ago, I wonder why this remote has not changed since the 1990's.
I think there is plenty of scope to make it smaller and lighter,and make it better all round.