Home > Consumer Reviews > Marantz SR7002 Surround Receiver

Marantz SR7002 Surround Receiver

See it at Amazon.com for $1,098.99

Average Customer Rating
(5.0 out of 5)

Amazon Customer Reviews

Most Helpful First | Newest First | + Share
21 of 21 people found the following review helpful:

Marantz SR7002 Powerful-Great Sound-User Friendly

(5 out of 5) by M. Daley on Jan 14, 2009 (Wisconsin - USA)
This is a bit long but I hope reviewers will benefit by my experiences.

Marantz is a name not found at most popular chain type stores, but it is one worth seeking out. I've had Marantz receivers and amplifiers since the 1970s, and that's not because I didn't consider other brands over that time. After research and demoing other brands, I kept coming back to Marantz. I have a Marantz SR7200 surround receiver that has worked flawless since I got it in 2002. But since I recently upgraded to an HD TV, an HD satellite receiver, and a Blu Ray player, I got the itch to upgrade to an HD surround receiver. The SR7200 was working fine, but doesn't have the latest PLIIx, HDMI inputs and outputs, and some of the other high definition sound and video capabilities. So my research began (and I really planned to try another brand this time). I scoured the internet obsessively (as I always do, and did for my TV and Blu Ray player), reading user reviews and professional reviews, and lab tests. I discovered the SR7002 which got very good marks, but another popular brand kept popping up as the recommended choice. It was just under a grand, so I bit the bullet and purchased the receiver. It had all of the latest bells and whistles and was a very good receiver. But for me, the warmth of the Marantz sound and the user friendly set up and menus was just not there. After a few days of use and adjusting, I returned the receiver, spent an extra $130, and walked out with the Marantz SR7002. Very wise choice for me. The SR7002 has a few less bells and whistles of the previous brand I tried, but it certainly has all of what most folks will need. It has plenty of power for my mid to large living room. The set up and menus are straight forward and very user friendly. Just as a test, I compared the quality of video I get when I run the HDMI video signal from my satellite receiver and Blu Ray player direct to the TV, and when I run the HDMI video signal through the SR7002 first, then to the TV. I cannot tell the difference. There is no loss of video quality running through the receiver first. The beauty of that is less cables to use and easier use of switching between functions. And the sound - excellent. For me, there is a warmth and fullness to the Marantz sound that I don't hear with other receivers. I've read the manual a bit more thoroughly now and have tweaked the system slightly the last few weeks and am even more satisfied. The automatic speaker "calibration" system is very simple to use and balances the speakers wonderfully. It calculates the distances each speaker is away from various sitting positions, adjusts volumes, etc. After that I did go in and made some very minor volume adjustments to suit my taste, particularly the sub and the crossover setting to the sub - everyone's speakers and tastes are different. But it's a great way to establish a solid balanced base to make personal adjustments from. The remote is fine too. It is a learning remote, and I've been able to program it to control my satellite receiver, my Blu Ray player, a DVD recorder, a VHS machine, and my TV. Very nice. I will say that I have since gotten a Harmony One universal remote that, after some experience and program tweaking with it, is excellent, and that is what I use. But I still keep the Marantz remote nearby just in case. I really could have gotten by with the Marantz remote just fine and would have been happy, but the Harmony One has other advanced qualities that are quite nice (but that's another review). So after a ton of research and a try out of a recommended brand, Marantz came through again. I'm totally satisfied. The receiver is the heart of any system; so you need to review, research, and try out for yourself; but in my experiences over the years, Marantz has always been a high quality product, and the SR7002 doesn't disappoint. If you want power and high quality sound, in a user friendly system, for just over a grand, this is it.

14 of 16 people found the following review helpful:

Excellent a/v receiver

(5 out of 5) by E. L. Marzano on Jan 4, 2008 (Brazil)
I've just bought this receiver and it's quality is excellent !!! It has a lot of inputs and outputs, many digital (both optical and coaxial audio inputs), a bunch of component, composite, s-vide inputas.
It also has the upscaling feature through HDMI output.
The sound quality is impressive. The user can also program which digital or analog inputs / outputs will be used for each device connected to the system.
Cons.: Only one: It generates a lot of heat (power consumption of 750W)

0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

Marantz SR7002 Surround Receiver

(5 out of 5) by Justin M. Molnar on Aug 31, 2009
Awesome Receiver then again what Marantz is bad. Awesome sound quality, good hdmi quality. Overall Just an Excellent receiver.

8 of 18 people found the following review helpful:

The Best and Truely Real Sound you Ever Heard

(5 out of 5) by Mark W. Sweeny Jr. on Mar 1, 2008 (Town of Onondaga, N.Y. USA)
God why 35% of people would get the Onkyo or any other Receiver Is beyond reason-OR just their pocket book because IF you can afford It "The Marantz" Is the only way to go for truely REAL
sound! There Is no other. Believe me you will appreciate It and be one happy Individual If you can afford It or wait until you can.
Or you can get the Marantz SR 4002 which also has DTS Sound and 3 HDMI Inputs which are automatically digitally assigned. That's what I got for my second room system and at half the price of the SR7002.
And you won't be burning 125 watts like the big one.
Either way stick with Marantz for your receiver!