Home > Consumer Reviews > Equity 29002 10-Inch Metal Wall Clock with Indoor Temperature and Humidity Gauge
Equity 29002 10-Inch Metal Wall Clock with Indoor Temperature and Humidity Gauge
See it at Amazon.com for $9.69Average Customer Rating
(2.0 out of 5)
Amazon Customer Reviews
Most Helpful First | Newest First | + Share10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
Very loud
(2 out of 5) by Vita Brevis on Jan 7, 2008 (San Jose, CA USA)Pros: It is cheap and displays time, humidity and temperature.
Cons: It is extremely loud. The ticking is so noisy that I had to remove it from two rooms. The product description said "Metal Wall Clock", so I expected the outer ring to be metal; in fact, it is plastic with metallic paint. No visible part is made from metal. However, the plastic looks fine.
Bottom line: you get what you pay for.
Cons: It is extremely loud. The ticking is so noisy that I had to remove it from two rooms. The product description said "Metal Wall Clock", so I expected the outer ring to be metal; in fact, it is plastic with metallic paint. No visible part is made from metal. However, the plastic looks fine.
Bottom line: you get what you pay for.
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
bad product
(1 out of 5) by Valman on Jun 15, 2008It is loud, it is plastic and absolutely not metal, and it goes behind 5 mn every week or so!
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
not precise and too noisy
(1 out of 5) by H. Hung on Jan 12, 2008 (Boston, MA)The clock fell 3 hours behind in 10 days and the tick-tack sound is too loud.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
Not so much...
(1 out of 5) by Denise on May 15, 2009 (Jacksonville, FL United States)We bought one of these clocks from another retailer. First one stopped working after only a week. Took it back and got another because we liked the large display (great from in the shower without your glasses on!) but it too stopped keeping time after a few weeks. Don't waste your time (pun intended)!
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
cheaply made
(2 out of 5) by Brian M. Rice on Oct 10, 2009 (Wixom, MI United States)didn't really work as described and used batteries quite fast. definately not a quality product