Home > Consumer Reviews > 1.3MP Digital Camera
1.3MP Digital Camera
See it at Amazon.com for $22.29Average Customer Rating
(3.0 out of 5)
Amazon Customer Reviews
Most Helpful First | Newest First | + Share3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
excellent camera, not a toy, not for a first camera
(4 out of 5) by Michelle M. Ress on Aug 15, 2008 (Felton, CA., USA)I have one of these and have taken a lot of pictures with it and put them on flickr and they get more comments that a lot of the pictures I take with expensive cameras. It's also easy to modify and there are plenty
of hacks on the www you can find. It also takes an SD card which none
of the other key chain cameras do and that was the big plus for me.
Use rechargeable batteries. The weakest flaw in the camera is that it
always draws current so will drain your battery if left in however there
is a fairly simple hack to fix this issue.
Here are my pictures:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=vq1005&w=9754872%40N08
of hacks on the www you can find. It also takes an SD card which none
of the other key chain cameras do and that was the big plus for me.
Use rechargeable batteries. The weakest flaw in the camera is that it
always draws current so will drain your battery if left in however there
is a fairly simple hack to fix this issue.
Here are my pictures:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=vq1005&w=9754872%40N08
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
The Little Camera that Couldn't
(1 out of 5) by A. Speck on Mar 15, 2008 (Central PA,USA/Ghana, West Africa)You get what you pay for, but in this case it wasn't even what was paid for. VERY cheap camera that is hard to focus and frame a subject. Purchased it for my daughter for her first camera nad it was worthless in teaching her anything about photography.
8 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
VistaQuest 1.3 Digital Camera
(4 out of 5) by Gem Rivers on Jun 8, 2007 (California USA)The picture quality is good, and good videos, too. It's pretty easy to use, but it's hard to load the pictures into the computer.
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
the photos were nice but it broke within a month
(2 out of 5) by Amanda M. Mcmahon on May 16, 2009 (Houghton, MI)as the title says, the photos werent' bad considering the low quality (great for the web) but it broke within a month