Home > Consumer Reviews > KINYO UV-520SIL 1-WAY Vhs Cassette Rewinder

KINYO UV-520SIL 1-WAY Vhs Cassette Rewinder

See it at Amazon.com for $7.65

Average Customer Rating
(2.5 out of 5)

Amazon Customer Reviews

Most Helpful First | Newest First
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
(3 out of 5)

Product works fine - Vendor stinks

Feb 21, 2007 - By Szott (Cincinnati)

It's slow but it does the job.
I ordered two of them but ANTOnline only sent me one. They reversed the charge on the second one only after I invoked Amazon's A-Z protection. They never admitted to the mistake and basically said I'm lying. Reading through their reviews it quickly becomes apparent that they never admit to ever having made a mistake. That's amazing and a little hard to believe. I'll never do business with that company again and I urge you to do the same.

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
(1 out of 5)

rewinder sucks!

Aug 6, 2007 - By J. Singletary (Altus, OK)

Ordered two, as the old one, same name and model, had lasted 5 years.
These two BOTH do not work at all. NO lights, nothing. Looks like the motors are missing.
ATNonline, who shipped them, said to contact the manufacturer. Yeah, they in China. But, ATNonline refused to accept the return, and also did not provide ANY information on the manufacturer.
AMAZON has refunded the money, but frustration over this deal sure chills my attitude.

Don't buy anything from ATNonline.
JS

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
(1 out of 5)

CAUTION-DON'T BUY!

Mar 22, 2007 - By Melinda Thompson

Attracted to the affordability, I got what I paid for. Within one month, the rewinder stopped functioning. Sent it back (paid $9 postage to do so) and quickly received either a new one or repaired one. Within two weeks, it again stopped working. Just went ahead and bought something better manufactured by another company. Beware! Advise anyone thinking about this item to avoid it!!

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
(1 out of 5)

Kinyo VHS Rewinder -- Find another product.

Aug 12, 2007 - By S. Page (Michigan)

Purchased one in April because we had had an older one that worked well, but finally wore itself out. This product lasted...with little use...less than 2 months. I didn't figure it would be worth sending back to the company for a replacement that would probably be the same.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
(1 out of 5)

Very poor quality

Jun 30, 2008 - By William (Indianapolis, Indiana USA)

Consider this a disposable. If it is worth the money to you to buy one, knowing it will probably fail after a few months, then go ahead.