Home > Consumer Reviews > Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM Lens for Canon EOS Cameras

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM Lens for Canon EOS Cameras

See it at Amazon.com for $825.00

Average Customer Rating
(5.0 out of 5)

Amazon Customer Reviews

Most Helpful First | Newest First
168 of 179 people found the following review helpful:
(4 out of 5)

Great pictures, but not perfect

May 18, 2004 - By Amazon Customer

I use the 70-300 with a Digital Rebel, giving a maxium equivalent focal length of a 480mm lens on a 35mm film camera body. I thought about buying one of Canon's 70-200L series, but they are huge, white, and heavy. I am not a professional photographer and decided I didn't want to look like a geek trying to masquerade as one. Besides, I like to take my camera with me, like tucked under my ski jacket, so there is an upper limit to practicality.
So far, photos have mainly been of kids playing baseball. I've shot roughly 1000 pictures in the few weeks I've had it. From the outfield fence, I've been able to take some great pictures of the batters. At maximum focal length, tracking movement of players takes some skill, which I am still trying to master. From the baselines, I have to zoom out to keep the action in the frame. I haven't had a need yet to use the IS since I use a fast shutter speed for sports.
Picture quality is very good. Photos are crisp across the field. I assume the magazines will test this lens eventually under lab conditions, but I can't see any imperfections with real world photos.
My only complaint is with the zoom control. The lens has a lock to hold it in the shortest focal length because the lens will move by itself when pointed up or down. The rotating ring for the zoom control is a little too hard to rotate when the camera is level, and especially when going against gravity. It is fine for still subjects, but it is a challenge for quick focal length changes with sports. Gearing for a more rotation with less force would have made this lens ideal.


132 of 132 people found the following review helpful:
(5 out of 5)

Criminally bum rapped.

Jun 8, 2005 - By J. A. Bilello (Great Neck, NY USA)

I spent weeks in forums reading up on this lens, and always seemed to come across a mixed bag of comments about it. I've had it for about a month, and I have taken a good amount of pictures with it. It does take great pictures, all the way up to 300mm. There is a touch of softness at 300mm, but this can all be taken care of using an unsharp mask in Photoshop/Paint Shop Pro/etc..... As a matter of fact, this lens seems particularly receptive to sharpening. People swear by L lenses, but if it's between this lens and say the 70-200mm IS you're talking about a minimal difference in sharpness out of the camera, and the 70-200mm IS costs more with less of a range. The DO is also black, and the DO technology enables it to be much smaller than you'd expect. At full zoom it is smaller than the 70-200mm IS or non-IS!! I took this lens to a NY Mets baseball game, and did not stick out like a sore thumb. YOU CAN TAKE THIS LENS ANYWHERE!!! The image stabilization is great, and has 2 modes you can use.

I am very satisfied with this lens. Don't let the L snobs sway you away.

I bought this for 1169.95 and it's $30 drop to 1139.95 was refunded to me by Amazon. I wouldn't shop anywhere else.

great lens, great place to buy.


100 of 100 people found the following review helpful:
(5 out of 5)

Excellent Lens

Jan 29, 2006 - By L C (Oregon)

I love this lens. I'd like to compare it to the canon 70-200 f/2.8 L, because I own that too. I originally bought the 70-200 because I really like the L series glass, having previously purchased other L lenses. I am a small woman and I found it to be very cumbersome and often left it at home (though it is an excellent lens on it's own) because of it's size. My husband suggested the 70-300 f/4-5.6 DO IS as an alternative. I am SO pleased with the lens. I recently shot over 250 photos at a zoo. All hand held, something I could NOT do with the 70-200, and many at the extreme 300mm. The IS is amazing, the weight of the lens very manageable. It was a cloudy, sometimes rainy day and yet the colors were true and the focus, even in low light situations, very accurate. I used no flash, even indoors. The photos through glass and mesh were so clear, you'd never know either were there. On a sunny day practice shoot, I had no trouble with lens flare, even without using a hood. (I was trying to get flare, just because it was mentioned in other reviews.) So, if you do not wish to haul a heavy lens around and you want all the benefits of an L series photo, I would recommend this lens.


69 of 69 people found the following review helpful:
(5 out of 5)

Great Lens!

Dec 31, 2005 - By George Mitsuoka (Centennial, Colorado USA)

I originally purchased the other (non-DO) Canon 70-300mm zoom lens but found so many annoyances with it that I returned it. I find this DO lens to be much, much nicer and worth the extra cost. The issues I had with the non-DO lens were: it's big and noisy (focus and IS); slow to focus; if pointed down, the lens violently pops-out to full zoom, thus requiring use of the zoom lock whenever not in use; the filter ring rotates during zoom, making use of a polarizing filter difficult; you cannot manually focus if the lens is in AF mode; chromatic aberrations were noticable.

The DO lens has none of these issues: it is compact (about the same size as the Canon EFS 17-85), quiet, and fast focusing. The lens holds its focal length if pointed up or down. The filter ring does not rotate during zoom, and you can manually focus whether in AF or MF mode. I've seen no chromatic aberrations with this lens. Shots are clear and crisp throughout the entire range.

I didn't consider the highly-rated L series lenses because I knew that I wouldn't regularly carry such a large and obtrusive lens. I can literally carry this DO lens in my jacket pocket wherever I go, and not attract a lot of attention when it's mounted on my camera. Your needs may vary.

It's also a pleasure to own what I consider to be a technological marvel. With excellent image stabilization and autofocus, and being one of only two SLR lenses in the world to use diffractive optics (the other one costs over $5k), this lens defines state of the art.


55 of 56 people found the following review helpful:
(5 out of 5)

worth every penny

Jan 13, 2006 - By Ogen Perry (Los Altos Hills, CA USA)

When I got my Rebel XT I was initially disappointed by the image quality. It did not take long to realize that the kit lens is the weak link. Over the next several months I kept going back and forth between different reviews and finally decided to splurge on this lens. It is at least twice as expensive as what I had initially budgeted but I have been very happy with it. The lens itself is very sharp and the IS technology allows you to shoot up to 3 f-stops slower. It has a very solid feel. I sell many of my pictures through an amateur photography site and since I started shooting with the IS lens, the reviews have been very positive.

The lens has a 58mm diameter -- same as the kit lens. Any filter you may have purchased for the kit lens will work on this one as well. It comes with a hood. Unfortunately, when not in use, the hood masks to zoom lock so you need to remove the hood in order to unlock the lens. That's a minor nit and it is essentially the only one I have come up with in several months of use.

I am so sold on the IS technology that I have just ordered the 17-85mm lens as well. I plan to get rid of the kit lens alltogether.