Home > Consumer Reviews > Orion 40mm Sirius Plossl 1.25" Eyepiece

Orion 40mm Sirius Plossl 1.25" Eyepiece

See it at Amazon.com for $51.95

Average Customer Rating
(3.5 out of 5)

Amazon Customer Reviews

Most Helpful First | Newest First | + Share
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

why 40 mm is better though

(4 out of 5) by Sergei on Jul 9, 2004 (United Kingdom)
The reason to buy a 40 mm is to go to LOWER magnification to have a brighter view of deep sky object. This eyepice will give you (40/32) square (e.g. 1.5 times) brighter images of galaxies.
As galaxies are big enough not to require much magnification (most M list are >20 ' - compare with suns 32' diameter) lower magnification is actually better. Field of view is not that important if you can't see it because it is not bright enough - is it? I mean is better to see smaller galaxy then none.
NB. Depending of the F ratio you may not be able to use a 40mm though - see books - can't remember right now the rule for that.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

Get the 32mm instead...

(3 out of 5) by Zhimbo on Jun 18, 2004 (New Hampshire USA)
The widespread existence of 40mm Plossl eyepieces with 1.25" barrels in most companies' product lines is a mystery.

Most people get eyepieces in this focal length to get the widest possible field of view with a 1.25" barrel eyepiece - yet a 40mm Plossl witha 43 degree apparent field of view shows no more sky than a 32mm Plossl with a 52 degree apparent field of view! (In my scope, they both show about 1.35 degrees of actual sky). But the 32mm will have a wider apparent field of view and somewhat higher magnification. There's really no reason to buy the 40mm Plossl.

But I did, a while back. Now I've learned. This eyepeice is actually of decent quality, although there is some minor astigmatism of the image towards the edge when I used it with my 6inch f/8 telescope (not seen in the shorter focal length Sirius Plossls). All the Sirius Plossls are good values, but get the 32mm version instead.