Home > Consumer Reviews > CASIO CA53W-1 Watch with Calculator
CASIO CA53W-1 Watch with Calculator
See it at Amazon.com for $16.23Average Customer Rating
Amazon Customer Reviews
Most Helpful First | Newest First | + Share12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
Great Watch
I have had mine for eight years and have never replaced the battery. The original band just broke the other day. This watch cost about $18.00 eight years ago and it has performed very well.
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
An excellent product
I had this watch for over six years, I am replacing it only because my puppy chew the bands on it, otherwise I highly recomend it, specially at this price. Thanks.
11 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
Under 20 bucks for hardcore nerdiness
Watch Video Here: http://www.amazon.com/review/RD2UP2V41P81H A little video review of the Casio CA 53W digital watch, emphasize the lovely nerdy styling.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
Still telling the right time after 20+years on original battery!
I have owned one of these watches since I was in grade school back in the early 1980s. The band has since fallen apart but I've always kept it in my night stand drawer because I was fascinated that it kept going with the original battery intact. Just last night (9-19-2008) I found the watch buried deep in my drawer. When I took it out the time was spot on, less than a minute off what the rest of our clocks say. I haven't set the time on this watch since I was a kid and I'm 40 now. This baffles me.
How is it possible that this watch still runs? I don't know. I wish I knew exactly when I got it but I really don't remember. It had to be around 1982. Remarkable.
How is it possible that this watch still runs? I don't know. I wish I knew exactly when I got it but I really don't remember. It had to be around 1982. Remarkable.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
Beware - No Backlight!!
I've enjoyed Casio calculator-watches for many years. This one looks and feels cheaper than its predecessors. Most importantly, it lacks a back-light rendering useless in low-light.