Home > Consumer Reviews > Polaroid Fun Flash 640 0.3MP Digital Camera Kit

Less than 1 megapixel, you can't fit it in your pocket and no slot for a memory card. The pictures aren't that clear and has a very cheap feel to the outer casing of the camera. I'd recommend with the better technology these days to save up and invest in at least 3 megaxpixel and higher. You will not only get better technology, but the newer cameras are better looking and don't have the cheap feel to it, and more than likely it will fit into your pocket and feel better in your hands for sure. Please don't even think about buying the Polaroid Funflash 640. Stay away from it.

this was my first camera. Since then I have had the Polaroid PDZ2300 and HP Photosmart 435 (Check my reviews). I thought it was a good camera for the amount of pixels. But I was limited to wat I could do. I would defiently recommend at least a 1.3MP though. I found the software confusing too. I could only get 15 pictures though so that was a down. I have come along way since this camera, but this camera was a good beginner.

If you use the program compatability wizard on the setup program on the CD the software for the camera will install and run fine in XP. I rated the camera low because mine too has the same issues with the lcd (mylar ribbon inside the camera loses contact) and I do agree that all serial port connected cameras are slow to transfer images(after all serial ports were only designed for analog modems anyway). My camera also has a single bad pixel in the center of the CMOS imager that is always black.

i have windows XP and cant use my camera now....no drivers for XP

Ifound this product easy to use I am a leagely blind individual and yet i could take good pics with it which i could not do with a plain camra will recommend to my friends