Home > Consumer Reviews > Bushnell Deep Space 420 x 60mm Refractor Telescope

Bushnell Deep Space 420 x 60mm Refractor Telescope

See it at Amazon.com for $89.99

Average Customer Rating
(2.5 out of 5)

Amazon Customer Reviews

Most Helpful First | Newest First | + Share

A decent telescope for the money

(4 out of 5) by Richard Tibbitts on Dec 4, 2008
I bought mine several years ago and have never been disappointed with its performance. As for the self-appointed authorities on the subject, some people have limited space at home and wouldn't necessarily find the highly touted Dobsonian design to their liking. Frankly, I like a refractor better (though I've had reflectors as well, and found them satisfactory).

Given the combination of price and performance, I feel compelled to award this economical telescope four stars. So there!

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

Awful

(1 out of 5) by mauibeach on Sep 22, 2007 (delaware)
This was what I chose for my 15 year prize from work. It went to the curb for trash pick up just the other day. Junk is what it is. I was so excited to have a new back deck this summer and use the telescope with my boys. Tried for about 2 hours and wasn't worth my time. The view finder was no help. We saw more without the lenses in! Don't wast your money.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

Bushnell Deep Space Telescope

(4 out of 5) by Mary A. Mallon on Aug 19, 2006
I bought this telescope for my 6 yr. daughter. It's a good telescope and good price for a starter. I didn't want to spend too much money and have her use it once. Easy to setup (comes in many pieces) and use. Comes with extra different size scopes. I have to say .. I few mfg. screws fell out (the ones needed to hold it to the stand). We easily replaced them with a slightly wider screw and it hasn't been a problem. Stand Height is adjustable. Doesn't fold up unless you take the support stand off (held on with screws). It has a good view .. it was pretty cool to see the markings in the moon. I recommend it for a beginner or young child. You get what you are paying for. This is a great price for a good+ telescope.

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:

Not all that good

(1 out of 5) by Don Quixote on Dec 25, 2005 (CA, USA)
This scope is not really very good for viewing planets but is ok for the moon if you stick with the 20MM eyepiece, the 5MM, giving about 140X, is just to much for this mount as it vibrates very easily and is hard to hold anything in the FOV for very long! I think it would be better for a person to buy a 4.5 inch reflector with a Dobsian mount for just a few bucks more.

13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:

Horrible

(1 out of 5) by James Koenig on Aug 19, 2005 (Minnesota)
This scope is NOT a good starter scope for anyone interested in astronomy. Here's why:

1. The objective is too small, only 60 mm, 2.36 inches, so it is too small to bring in the light necessary for even a beginning look at the universe. I suppose it is adequate for the moon, but that is it. The planets will appear as very small disks. One will be able to see Saturn's rings, but the image will be very small. Forget it for deep sky objects, clusters, galaxies, etc.

2. The mount is an altazimuth, which will not follow the celestial object in the sky. The earth is rotating, and anyone focusing on a star or moon will quickly find the object drifting out of the field of vision. A better mount is an equatorial mount which makes it much easier to track objects.

3. The mount will vibrate when touched, which will cause the image in the eyepiece to "shiver", which is very frustrating.

Even for the low price, don't be enticed by this scope; it has too many flaws. Save your money for a larger scope with a better mount.

Jim "Konedog" Koenig, astronomy buff