AT&T 9301 900 MHz Cordless Telephone

See it at Amazon.com for
$79.00Average Customer Rating

(3.0 out of 5)
Amazon Customer Reviews
Most Helpful First |
Newest First |
+ Share
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
Clearly, an excellent buy

(4 out of 5) by Ultraman on Jul
19, 2000 (Los Angeles, CA)
I had been looking for several weeks at purchasing my first cordless phone, leaving corded phones behind me as a thing of the past. A year ago I purchased an AT&T Digital Answering machine, which has turned out to be the very first answering machine that I have ever had that has lasted more than six months, so I decided to check into AT&T's line of cordless phones. Once again, I am pleased by their product.
This 900 Mhz cordless phone is exactly the buy I was looking for: nothing too fancy, 900 Mhz power, easy to use, good standard features, not very heavy, small, and has good range. Just to try out its distance, I walked out to the mailbox and was still able to hear and talk clearly. Best of all, it's easy on my college student wallet and it'll be great for my dormroom. The range will come in handy when I want to talk in the hall so my roommate doesn't hear everything I have to say.
All in all, it's a great buy and has all the uses you'll need for a basic cordless phone. If you don't need goofy gadgets and useless extras, this is the buy for you.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
Poor Quality

(1 out of 5) by Amazon Customer on Oct
21, 2000
Sadly, this is the last AT&T phone I'll ever buy. I've just had too many bad experiences.
I bought one because it was inexpensive, small, and could accomodate a headset.
Unfortunately, that's where the good part ends. I constantly get static and interference. What's worse, it has started not working at all. About 25% of the time I answer a call, I can hear the caller, but they can't hear me. Another 25% of the time, the line is just plain dead.
I own two Panasonics and the quality is perfect... all of the time. And they appear to have worn well over time.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
good looks, bad sound and reception

(2 out of 5) by Amazon Customer on Aug
23, 2000
I bought this phone because I like my AT&T digital answering machine and I wanted something compact and nicely designed. And the price was right.
Now I know why this phone is so cheap; the reception is terrible. Everyone I talk to sounds like they're calling from a tin can. Granted, I live in an NYC apartment but my old Sony cordless was able to deal with that just fine.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
It works well.

(4 out of 5) by Amazon Customer on Oct
9, 2000
I've had it for about 10 months now, and it still works as well as the first day we got it. There are some annoyances, like having to pause for a second after picking up the phone before saying anything, otherwise the caller just hears "--lo?" instead of "hello?" And sometimes the memory doesn't want to work--have to hit phone, memory + # twice before it dials. Other than that, there's been no problem. Reception is excellent, unless the caller's is faulty. The battery has worked fine. And it works well with our AT&T 1717 answering machine.
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
Disappointment

(1 out of 5) by Amazon Customer on Sep
7, 2000
This phone was purchased after a history with wonderful AT&T phones, but this purchase was a disappointment. The phone is absolutely horrible. Either there is such static on the line you can not hear the other person, the buttons do not work to dial or to turn it on or off. It turned out to be a complete waste of money, being that I had to purchase a new phone to replace this inadequate one. I would think twice about ever buying another AT&T cordless phone.